clock when the festive throng separated--and thus closed one of the
most brilliant installations that Windsor had ever seen, since Edward
first became the founder of the order. If there was any drawback to the
gratification which the King felt on this occasion, it was at beholding
Wilkes and his daughter conspicuously seated among the spectators in
the courtyard; whither the man whom the King hated had penetrated by
means of a ticket from Lord Tankerville. It was at this period that
Mr. Fox revived, for a few court-days, the fashion of appearing at the
drawing-room in red-heeled shoes. To the public, these matters were
far more comic than the comic portion of the “Installation,” in which
(setting aside the Edward III. of Aikin, and the Genius of England,
played by Reddish) King enacted Sir Dingle, a court fool knighted;
Parsons, Nat Needle; and Weston, Roger. Never was foolish knight played
by an actor so chivalrous of aspect as King.
I will avail myself of this opportunity to state that at solemn
ceremonies, like that above named, four of our kings of England were
knighted by their own subjects. These were Edward III., Henry VI. and
VII., and Edward VI. The latter was dubbed by the Lord Protector,
who was himself empowered to perform the act by letters patent,
under the great seal. At a very early period, priests, or prelates
rather, sometimes conferred the honor on great public occasions. The
Westminster Synod deprived them of this privilege in 1102.
It has been said that English knights wearing foreign orders, without
permission of their own sovereign, are no more knights in reality than
those stage knights of whom I have been treating. This, however, is
questionable, if so great an authority as Coke be not in error. That
great lawyer declares that a knight, by whomsoever created, can sue
and be sued by his knightly title, and that such is not the case with
persons holding other foreign titles, similar to those of the English
peerage. Let me add that, among other old customs, it was once common
in our armies for knighthood to be conferred previous to a battle, to
arouse courage, rather than afterward, as is the case now--after the
action, in order to reward valor. Even this fashion is more reasonable
than that of the Czar, who claps stars and crosses of chivalry on the
bosoms of beaten generals, to make them pass in Muscovy for conquerors.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account