Labour and the Popular WelfareMallock, W. H. (William Hurrell)
General
Labour and the Popular Welfare
Mallock, W. H. (William Hurrell)
Labor; Labor movement; Socialism; Working class
Were it necessary, and would space permit of it, we might extend this
history further. We might cite the inventions of Huntsman, of Onions,
of Cort, and Neilson, and show how each of these was conceived, was
perfected, and was brought into practical use, whilst the nation as
a whole remained inert, passive, and ignorant, and the experts of
the trade were hostile, and sometimes equally ignorant. Huntsman
perfected his process in a secrecy as carefully guarded as that of a
mediæval necromancer hiding himself from the vigilance of the Church;
whilst James Neilson, the inventor of the hot-blast, had at first to
encounter the united ridicule and hostility of all the shrewdest and
most experienced iron-masters in the kingdom.
[Sidenote ◆1 The history of the cotton manufacture does so with
equal force;]
◆¹ The history of the cotton manufacture offers precisely similar
evidence. Almost every one of those great improvements made in it, by
which Ability has multiplied the power of Labour, had to be forced
by the able men on the acceptance of adverse contemporaries. Hay was
driven from the country; Hargreaves from his native town; Arkwright’s
mill, near Chorley, was burnt down by a mob; Peel, who used Arkwright’s
machinery, was at one time in danger of his life. Nor was it only
the hostility of the ignorant that the inventors had to encounter.
They had to conquer Capital before they could conquer Labour; for
the Capitalists at the beginning were hardly more friendly to them
than the labourers. The first Capitalists who assisted Arkwright, and
had Ability enough to discover some promise in his invention, had
not enough Ability to see their way through certain difficulties,
and withdrew their help from him at the most critical moment. The
enterprising men who at last became his partners, and with the aid
of whose Capital his invention became successful, represented their
age just as little as Arkwright did. He and they, indeed, had the same
opportunities as the society round them; but they stand contrasted to
the society by the different use they made of them.
[Sidenote ◆1 Also the history of the steam-engine, as a very
curious anecdote will show.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account