Labour and the Popular WelfareMallock, W. H. (William Hurrell)
General
Labour and the Popular Welfare
Mallock, W. H. (William Hurrell)
Labor; Labor movement; Socialism; Working class
[Sidenote ◆1 We will begin with the spontaneous tendencies—_i.e._
the natural actions of individuals, each pursuing his
own interest.]
[Sidenote ◆2 There are two ways of getting rich: (1) by
abstracting from an existing income, or (2) by adding to
it. The rich class of the modern world have, as a whole,
become rich in the second way.]
◆¹ The natural causes that tend to distribute amongst Labour a large
portion of the wealth produced by Ability will be best understood if we
first consider for a moment the two ways—and the two only ways—in which
a minority can become wealthy. ◆² What these are can be easily realised
thus. Let us imagine a community of eight labouring men, who make each
of them _fifty pounds_ a year, and who represent Labour; and let us
imagine a ninth man,—a man of Ability,—who represents the minority. The
ninth man might, if he were strong enough, rob each of the eight men
of _twenty-five pounds_, compelling them each to live on _twenty-five
pounds_ instead of on _fifty pounds_, and appropriate to himself an
annual _two hundred pounds_. Or he might reach the same result in a
totally different way. He might so direct and assist the Labour of
the eight men, that without any extra effort to themselves they each,
instead of _fifty pounds_ produced _seventy-five pounds_, and if,
under these circumstances, he took _twenty-five pounds_ from each, he
would gain the same sum as before, namely _two hundred pounds_, but,
as I said, in a totally different way. It would represent what he had
added to the original product of the labourers, instead of representing
anything he had taken from it. Now whatever may have been true of rich
classes in former times and under other social conditions, the riches
now enjoyed by the rich class in this country have, with exceptions
which are utterly unimportant, been acquired by the latter of these two
methods, not by the former. They represent an addition to the product
of Labour, not an abstraction from it. This is, of course, clear from
what has been said already; but it is necessary here to specially bear
it in mind.
[Sidenote ◆1 Let us consider the nature of the process,]
[Sidenote ◆2 By first representing Labour and Ability in their
simplest imaginable forms; Ability, or the employing
class, being represented as one man.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account