Labour policy—false and true : $b A study in economic history and industrial economicsMacassey, Lynden Livingston
History
Labour policy—false and true : $b A study in economic history and industrial economics
Macassey, Lynden Livingston
Industrial policy -- Great Britain; Labor economics -- Great Britain; Labour Party (Great Britain)
if the Allies are willing to accept this form of payment, by the direct
employment of her labour in reconstructing devastated areas.” There can
hardly be much question that vacillation in the reparations policy has
been productive of serious injury to our foreign trade.
Inter-Allies Debts
The restoration of international trade depends also on a sound and
sensible recognition by those of the Allies who are creditor nations of
the economic effects of enforcing payment of the indebtedness to them by
the Governments of debtor nations, coupled with such action as they, in
the interests of civilization and of their own countries, find themselves
able to take in the direction of modification. Government war-debts have
produced for no debtor country any increase of its national wealth; they
can be paid by the debtor country only out of its capital or its income.
In regard to the first alternative, no debtor country can possibly, under
any scheme of finance, pay its government war-debts out of capital,
that is to say, out of home or foreign securities in the hands of its
Government or its nationals, or out of cash balances standing to the
credit abroad of either or both of them. If those debts are to be paid
at all, it must be out of income, that is to say, out of the surplus
realized by the export of natural products, manufactured goods, services
and “invisible exports,” after payment of the expenses involved in
producing such surplus, e.g. cost of raw material, labour involved in
manufacture, and other costs of production and expenses of rendering
the services. Now, the dominant fact to-day is that the debtor nations’
available surpluses are either insufficient, or not more than sufficient,
to cover their pre-war debts. How then in each case is the surplus to be
so enormously increased as to cover the fresh indebtedness resulting from
the Great War? In one way only—by enormously increased production, and by
a reduction in the national standard of living. Nothing is more certain
than the absolute impossibility of any debtor country being able to pay
its war-debts under its present standard of production and of living.
Supposing, however, it to be practicable, and that it is determined to
compel each debtor country to create the requisite surplus, what would
be the peril to international trade of such forced payments? Mr. F. C.
Goodenough—the Chairman of Barclay’s Bank—has explained the position with
cogent clarity; his illuminating exposition will be found in _The Times_
of April 11, 1922.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account