Labour policy—false and true : $b A study in economic history and industrial economicsMacassey, Lynden Livingston
History
Labour policy—false and true : $b A study in economic history and industrial economics
Macassey, Lynden Livingston
Industrial policy -- Great Britain; Labor economics -- Great Britain; Labour Party (Great Britain)
Reform of the relationship in industry between employers and employed
involves three things: securing contentment, achieving co-operation,
increasing production; these constitute the dynamic trinity. Only when
contentment can be secured is co-operation made possible; without
co-operation there never can be efficient production; production alone
can create the prosperity which is the sole source of the financial
ability of any industry to pay high wages and maintain good conditions of
employment. Contentment does not mean stagnation; it means willingness to
progress under an accepted system—in other words, evolution.
(_a_) Provision against Unemployment
If we are to secure contentment in industry, unquestionably the first
matter to be dealt with is unemployment. A distinction must be drawn
between normal unemployment—the result of seasonal or cyclic depressions
in trade, which arise from circumstances well-known in industry, either
affecting the world at large or peculiar to some country in particular,
or special to some national industry—and the abnormal unemployment
which has resulted from the Great War. We are now considering normal
unemployment. What Government should do to deal with the abnormal
unemployment occasioned by the war we have already discussed in Chapter
XXII.
Equalization of Demand for Labour
In regard to normal unemployment there are two things only which can
be done:—first, to reduce, so far as possible, fluctuations in the
demand for labour between one year and another, and one season of the
year with another season of the same year, and, secondly, to make the
best provision economically practicable for the maintenance during times
of trade depression of persons who are unemployed or under-employed.
It is most difficult to “equalize the demand for labour.” In ordinary
commercial business that is a matter largely outside the power of
Government, employers, or Trade Unions. It is one of the privileges which
is reserved for the consumer. The only directions in which fruitful
action can be taken are to provide a system such as exists under the
Labour Exchange organization, or that of certain Trade Unions, whereby
the workman out of a job can be put in touch with the employer who wants
labour of his particular description, and to arrange the execution of
public works by Government Departments or local authorities, and the
manufacture of stores or equipment for public purposes, the amount of
which is more or less standard, so that by postponing some and expediting
others some advance is possible towards making more uniform the demand
for labour as between good times and bad. But the limits within which
this is a practicable policy are much narrower than is generally
realized, and immensely more restricted than is suggested by the Labour
Party.
Insurance against Unemployment
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account