Labour policy—false and true : $b A study in economic history and industrial economicsMacassey, Lynden Livingston
History
Labour policy—false and true : $b A study in economic history and industrial economics
Macassey, Lynden Livingston
Industrial policy -- Great Britain; Labor economics -- Great Britain; Labour Party (Great Britain)
That industry should provide for its unemployment is obviously
reasonable. The taxpayer has no control over industrial conditions,
or over the wages which are paid, or the conditions of employment
in operation, and in respect of such matters industry is under no
responsibility to the taxpayer. Should this provision be made by each
industry in particular or by industry as a whole? It would be impossible
to form a scheme under which each industry would provide against its own
unemployment. There are many industries, ranging from those most highly
organized with employers and Trade Unions acting, and accustomed to act,
collectively and with some experience of the ratio of their unemployment,
down to industries which have no organization whatever nor any collective
machinery available for the operation of an insurance fund nor any
knowledge of their own unemployment. It is only a highly organized
industry that could undertake to provide for its own unemployed, and not
all highly organized industries, but merely a selected few—those which
are clearly separated off from other industries. To all but the initiated
it is surprising how industries are interlocked. If we take, for example,
the engineering industry, and industries like iron and steel, nuts and
bolts, bicycle parts and innumerable others, there is great interchange
of labour, especially unskilled. A large West-end store will be engaged
in fifty to sixty different industries. How would its interests in each
industry be separated? There is no doubt that it is to the financial
advantage of a highly organized clearly demarcated industry to provide
for its own unemployment insurance as compared with participation in a
State Scheme.
Sir Alfred Watson, the Government Actuary, before the Committee of
Inquiry on the Labour Exchanges, pointed out the great financial benefit
it would be to the principal industries to provide their own unemployment
insurance, and referred to the large margin there would be available
for the actual costs of the benefits. In a most interesting pamphlet
published on “Unemployment Insurance,” Mr. Henry Lesser, the President of
the National Federation of Employees Approved Societies, states that in
one industrial undertaking employers and employed pay in respect of the
National Unemployment Insurance Scheme over £22,000 per year, but that in
normal times the persons employed in that particular firm do not receive
in the aggregate in unemployment pay more than £800 a year, a case, he
says, which may be taken as typical of the whole of the industry in
question.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account