Labour policy—false and true : $b A study in economic history and industrial economicsMacassey, Lynden Livingston
History
Labour policy—false and true : $b A study in economic history and industrial economics
Macassey, Lynden Livingston
Industrial policy -- Great Britain; Labor economics -- Great Britain; Labour Party (Great Britain)
national standard of living can by no human ingenuity be maintained under
to-day’s conditions of output.
What Production Depends on
Lord Weir has truly pointed out[21] that there are only four methods of
improving the volume and efficiency of our national production:
(1) An increase in intensity of effort per operative hour;
(2) An increase in the number of operative hours per individual per day;
(3) An increase in the number of operative individuals;
(4) A perfecting of methods, processes and organizations, by which waste
of operative hours is eliminated.
Accepting this as an accurate statement, which it is, of how alone output
can be increased, I wish to point out the immediate obstacles to an
achievement of these four objects. They are these:
In regard to (1)—the workman’s low conception of work, his tendency, in
many trades, to lose time, his inveterate belief in restriction of output.
In regard to (2)—the conception of organized Labour that the present
47- or 48-hour ordinary working week is a social reform with which no
tampering will be permitted, and that if in times of trade prosperity
more hours are necessary, they ought to be worked as overtime.
In regard to (3)—the insistence of the Trade Unions, in this country,
on their rigid lines of demarcation of work—in other words, on certain
work being always reserved for certain Unions, without reference to the
prevailing industrial or commercial conditions.
In regard to (4)—the opposition of the workers to the introduction of
time- and labour-saving appliances, or of payment by results—and Lord
Weir adds: the killing of the spirit of enterprise among employers,
as the result of the taxation policy of the Government; the lack of
reciprocity and co-operation on the part of the Trade Unions, amounting
to active obstruction; and bad statesmanship on the part of the
employers’ organizations.
To state these four methods in their order of relative practicability,
they run (1), (4), (3) and (2). All the obstacles enumerated above to
securing greater production by methods (1), (4) and (3), are the fruit of
unsound economic theories that have for many years past been sedulously
instilled into Labour, and are now accepted by it as part of its everyday
rule of life and conduct.
The Workers’ Notion of the Secret Fund
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account