Labour policy—false and true : $b A study in economic history and industrial economicsMacassey, Lynden Livingston
History
Labour policy—false and true : $b A study in economic history and industrial economics
Macassey, Lynden Livingston
Industrial policy -- Great Britain; Labor economics -- Great Britain; Labour Party (Great Britain)
their abilities by hand and brain in the service not of the few
but of the whole community.
“The extent to which workers are challenging the whole system
of industrial organization is very much greater to-day than
ever before, and unrest proceeds not only from more immediate
and special grievances but also, to an increasing extent, from
a desire to substitute a democratic system of public ownership
and production for use with an increasing element of control by
the organized workers themselves for the existing capitalist
organization of industry.”
(p. vii.) “(_a_) A substantial beginning must be made of
instituting public ownership of the vital industries and
services in this country. Mines and the supply of coal,
railways, docks and other means of transportation, the supply
of electric power, and shipping, at least so far as ocean-going
services are concerned, should be at once nationalized.
“(_b_) Private profit should be entirely eliminated from the
manufacture of armaments, and the amount of nationalization
necessary to secure this should be introduced into the
engineering, shipbuilding and kindred industries.
“(_c_) There should be a great extension of municipal
ownership, and ownership by other local authorities and
co-operative control of those services which are concerned
primarily with the supplying of local needs.
“(_d_) Key industries and services should at once be publicly
owned.
“(_e_) This extension of public ownership over vital industries
should be accompanied by the granting to the organized workers
of the greatest practicable amount of control over the
conditions and the management of their various industries.”
“STATE CONTROL AND PRICES.
(p. viii.) “(_a_) Where an industry producing articles of
common consumption or materials necessary to industries
producing articles of common consumption cannot be at once
publicly owned, State control over such industries should be
retained.
“(_b_) State control has been shown to provide some check upon
profiteering and high prices, and this is a reason why it
should be maintained until industries pass into the stage at
which they can be conveniently nationalized,”
“CONCLUSIONS.
(p. xi.) “The fundamental causes of Labour unrest are to
be found rather in the growing determination of Labour to
challenge the whole existing structure of capitalist industry
than in any of the more special and smaller grievances which
come to the surface at any particular time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account