Lady Sybil's Choice: A Tale of the CrusadesHolt, Emily Sarah
History
Lady Sybil's Choice: A Tale of the Crusades
Holt, Emily Sarah
Crusades -- Fiction; Historical fiction
I know Guy does not think so, for he is devoted to his little Agnes; and
Héloïse is certainly the prettier child. But neither of them is equal
to the little King, who is a most beautiful boy, and has the quaintest
sayings ever heard from a child.
There, now! Did any body ever see any thing like these men?
Messire Tristan set forth yesterday morning; and what should he say to
Guy (who told me, with his eyes full of fun) but—
"Damoiselle Elaine will find out that it does not do to trifle with a
man’s heart. She will doubtless be angry at my defection; but I have
borne long enough with her caprice, and have now transferred my
affections to one who can be truer!"
Was ever mortal creature so misrepresented? Why, the man must have
thought I did not mean what I said! My caprice, indeed! Trifle with a
man’s heart! And as if affection could be transferred at will from one
person to another!
Guy seemed excessively amused with my exclamations.
"What a conceited set of people you men must be!" said I.
"Well, we are rather a bad set," answered Guy, laughing. "O little
Elaine, thou art so funny!"
"Pray, what is there funny about me?" said I. "And please to tell me,
Guy, why men always seem to fancy that women do not know their own
minds?"
"Well, they don’t," said Guy.
"Only the silly ones, who have no minds to know," I replied.
"Just so," answered he. "But those, thou seest, are the generality of
women. Rubies are scarce; pebbles are common."
"Only among women?" said I.
"Possibly not," responded Guy, looking very much amused. "Poor De
Montluc appears to be a ruby in his own eyes, and I presume he is only a
pebble in thine. Let us hope that Damoiselle Melisende will consider
him a gem of priceless value."
Well, I am sure I have no objection to that.
But another idea occurs to me, which is by no means so pleasant. Since
other people are always misunderstanding me, can it be possible that I
am constantly misunderstanding other people? I do think I have
misunderstood Eschine, and I am sorry for it. I like her a great deal
better now than I ever expected to do, and I almost admire that quiet
endurance of hers—partly because I feel Amaury so trying, and partly, I
suspect, because I have so little of the quality myself. But is it—can
it be—possible that I am misunderstanding Count Raymond?
I do not think so. Why should I think of a beautiful serpent whenever I
look at him? Why should I feel a sensation, of which I cannot get rid,
as if that dark handsome face of his covered something repugnant and
perilous? It is not reason that tells me this: it is something more
like instinct. Is it a true warning to beware of the man, or only a
foolish, baseless fancy, of which I ought to be ashamed?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account