Lamarck, the Founder of Evolution: His Life and WorkPackard, A. S. (Alpheus Spring)
History
Lamarck, the Founder of Evolution: His Life and Work
Packard, A. S. (Alpheus Spring)
Evolution (Biology); Lamarck, Jean Baptiste Pierre Antoine de Monet de, 1744-1829; Naturalists -- France -- Biography
This was succeeded by Rev. J. T. Gulick's profound essays "On Diversity
of Evolution under One Set of External Conditions"[235] (1872), and on
"Divergent Evolution through Cumulative Segregation"[236] (1887).
These and later papers are based on his studies on the land shells of
the Hawaiian Islands. The cause of their extreme diversity of local
species is, he claims, not due to climatic conditions, food, enemies, or
to natural selection, but to the action of what he calls the "law of
segregation."
Fifteen years later Mr. Romanes published his theory of physiological
selection, which covered much the same ground.
A very strong little book by an ornithologist of wide experience,
Charles Dixon,[237] and refreshing to read, since it is packed with
facts, is Lamarckian throughout. The chief factor in the formation of
local species is, he thinks, isolation; the others are climatic
influences (especially the glacial period), use and disuse, and sexual
selection as well as chemical agency. Dixon insists on the "vast
importance of isolation in the modification of many forms of life,
without the assistance of natural selection." Again he says: "Natural
selection, as has often been remarked, can only preserve a beneficial
variation--it cannot originate it, it is not a cause of variation; on
the other hand, the use or disuse of organs is a direct cause of
variation, and can furnish natural selection with abundance of material
to work upon" (p. 49). The book, like the papers of Allen, Ridgway,
Gulick, and others, shows the value of isolation or segregation in
special areas as a factor in the origination of varieties and species,
the result being the prevention of interbreeding, which would otherwise
swamp the incipient varieties.
Here might be cited Delboeuf's law:[238]
"When a modification is produced in a very small number of
individuals, this modification, even were it advantageous, would be
destroyed by heredity, as the favored individuals would be obliged
to unite with the unmodified individuals. _Il n'en est rien,
cependant._ However great may be the number of forms similar to it,
and however small may be the number of dissimilar individuals which
would give rise to an isolated individual, we can always, while
admitting that the different generations are propagated under the
same conditions, meet with a number of generations at the end of
which the sum total of the modified individuals will surpass that of
the unmodified individuals." Giard adds that this law is capable of
mathematical demonstration. "Thus the continuity or even the
periodicity of action of a primary factor, such, for example, as a
variation of the _milieu_, shows us the necessary and sufficient
condition under which a variety or species originates without the
aid of any secondary factor."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account