Lamarck, the Founder of Evolution: His Life and WorkPackard, A. S. (Alpheus Spring)
History
Lamarck, the Founder of Evolution: His Life and Work
Packard, A. S. (Alpheus Spring)
Evolution (Biology); Lamarck, Jean Baptiste Pierre Antoine de Monet de, 1744-1829; Naturalists -- France -- Biography
Conchologists, he says, did not care to collect or study fossil shells,
because they had lost their lustre, colors, and beauty, and they were
rejected from collections on this account as "dead" and uninteresting.
"But," he adds, "since attention has been drawn to the fact that these
fossils are extremely valuable _monuments_ for the study of the
revolutions which have taken place in different regions of the earth,
and of the changes which the beings living there have themselves
successively undergone (in my lectures I have always insisted on these
considerations), consequently the search for and study of fossils have
excited special interest, and are now the objects of the greatest
interest to naturalists."
Lamarck then combats the views of several naturalists, undoubtedly
referring to Cuvier, that the fossils are extinct species, and that the
earth has passed through a general catastrophe (_un bouleversement
universel_) with the result that a multitude of species of animals and
plants were consequently absolutely lost or destroyed, and remarks in
the following telling and somewhat derisive language:
"A universal catastrophe (_bouleversement_) which necessarily
regulates nothing, mixes up and disperses everything, is a very
convenient way to solve the problem for those naturalists who wish
to explain everything, and who do not take the trouble to observe
and investigate the course followed by nature as respects its
production and everything which constitutes its domain. I have
already elsewhere said what should be thought of this so-called
universal overturning of the globe; I return to fossils.
"It is very true that, of the great quantity of fossil shells
gathered in the different countries of the earth, there are yet but
a very small number of species whose living or marine analogues are
known. Nevertheless, although this number may be very small, which
no one will deny, it is enough to suppress the universality
announced in the proposition cited above.
"It is well to remark that among the fossil shells whose marine or
living analogues are not known, there are many which have a form
closely allied to shells of the same genera known to be now living
in the sea. However, they differ more or less, and cannot be
rigorously regarded as the same species as those known to be living,
since they do not perfectly resemble them. These are, it is said,
extinct species.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account