Lamarck, the Founder of Evolution: His Life and WorkPackard, A. S. (Alpheus Spring)
History
Lamarck, the Founder of Evolution: His Life and Work
Packard, A. S. (Alpheus Spring)
Evolution (Biology); Lamarck, Jean Baptiste Pierre Antoine de Monet de, 1744-1829; Naturalists -- France -- Biography
and historical geology, of the succession of life on the earth, of the
unity of organization pervading that life from monad to man all through
the ages from the Precambrian to the present age, know that there were
vast periods of preparation followed by crises, perhaps geologically
brief, when there were widespread changes in physical geography, which
reacted on the life-forms, rendering certain ones extinct, and modifying
others; but this conception is entirely distinct from the views of
Cuvier and his school,[101] which may, in the light of our present
knowledge, properly be deemed not only totally inadequate, but childish
and fantastic.
Cuvier cites the view of Dolomieu, the well-known geologist and
mineralogist (1770-1801), only, however, to reject it, who went to the
extent of supposing that "tides of seven or eight hundred fathoms have
carried off from time to time the bottom of the ocean, throwing it up in
mountains and hills on the primitive valleys and plains of the
continents" (Dolomieu in _Journal de Physique_).
Cuvier met with objections to his extreme views. In his discourse he
thus endeavors to answer "the following objection" which "has already
been stated against my conclusions":
"Why may not the non-existing races of mammiferous land quadrupeds
be mere modifications or varieties of those ancient races which we
now find in the fossil state, which modifications may have been
produced by change of climate and other local circumstances, and
since raised to the present excessive differences by the operation
of similar causes during a long succession of ages?
"This objection may appear strong to those who believe in the
indefinite possibility of change of forms in organized bodies, and
think that during a succession of ages, and by alternations of
habits, all the species may change into each other, or one of them
give birth to all the rest. Yet to these persons the following
answer may be given from their own system: If the species have
changed by degrees, as they assume, we ought to find traces of this
gradual modification. Thus, between the Palæotherium and the species
of our own days, we should be able to discover some intermediate
forms; and yet no such discovery has ever been made. Since the
bowels of the earth have not preserved monuments of this strange
genealogy, we have a right to conclude that the ancient and now
extinct species were as permanent in their forms and characters as
those which exist at present; or, at least, that the catastrophe
which destroyed them did not have sufficient time for the production
of the changes that are alleged to have taken place."
Cuvier thus emphatically rejects all idea that any of the tertiary
mammals could have been the ancestral forms of those now existing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account