Artists -- Fiction; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction; London (England) -- Fiction
The moral taint, mind, was all hypothetical. Charles Potts had not
heard one syllable of Margaret Dacre's history, had been told nothing
about it, knew nothing of her except that he and Geoffrey had saved her
from starvation in the streets. But when people go in for the public
profession of virtue, it is astonishing to find how quickly they listen
to reports of the shortcomings and backslidings of those who are not
professedly in the same category. It seemed a bit of fatalism too,
that this acquaintance should have occurred immediately on Geoffrey's
selling his picture for a large sum to Mr. Stompff. Had he not done
this, there is no doubt that the other thing would have been heard
of by few, noticed by none; but in art, as in literature, and indeed
in most other professions, no crime is so heavily visited as that of
being successful. It is the sale of your picture, or the success of
your novel, that first makes people find out how you steal from other
people, how your characters are mere reproductions of your own personal
friends,--for which you ought to be shunned,--how laboured is your
pathos, and how poor your jokes. It is the repetition of your success
that induces the criticism; not merely that you are a singular instance
of the badness of the public taste, but that you have a red nose, a
decided cast in one eye, and that undoubtedly your grandmother had
hard labour for stealing a clock. Geoff Ludlow the struggling might
have done as he liked without comment; on Geoff Ludlow the possessor
of unlimited commissions from the great Stompff it was meet that every
vial of virtuous wrath should be poured.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account