Russian literature -- 19th century -- History and criticism
In sharp contrast to the two elder brothers is the third brother,
Alosha, the hero of the book. He is one of the finest and most
sympathetic characters that Dostoievsky created. He has the simplicity
of “The Idiot,” without his naïveté, and without the abnormality
arising from epilepsy. He is a normal man, perfectly sane and sensible.
He is the very incarnation of “sweet reasonableness.” He is _Ivan
Durak_, Ivan the Fool, but without being a fool. Alosha, Dostoievsky
says, was in no way a fanatic; he was not even what most people call
a mystic, but simply a lover of human beings; he loved humanity;
all his life he believed in men, and yet nobody would have taken
him for a fool or for a simple creature. There was something in him
which convinced you that he did not wish to be a judge of men, that
he did not wish to claim or exercise the right of judging others.
One remarkable fact about his character, which is equally true of
Dostoievsky’s own character, was that Alosha with this wide tolerance
never put on blinkers, or shut his eyes to the wickedness of man, or
to the ugliness of life. No one could astonish or frighten him, even
when he was quite a child. Every one loved him wherever he went. Nor
did he ever win the love of people by calculation, or cunning, or
by the craft of pleasing. But he possessed in himself the gift of
making people love him. It was innate in him; it acted immediately and
directly, and with perfect naturalness. The basis of his character was
that he was a _Realist_. When he was in the monastery where he spent
a part of his youth, he believed in miracles; but Dostoievsky says,
“Miracles never trouble a Realist; it is not miracles which incline
a Realist to believe. A true Realist, if he is not a believer, will
always find in himself sufficient strength and sufficient capacity to
disbelieve even in a miracle. And if a miracle appears before him as an
undeniable fact, he will sooner disbelieve in his senses than admit the
fact of the miracle. If, on the other hand, he admits it, he will admit
it as a natural fact, which up to the present he was unaware of. The
Realist does not believe in God because he believes in miracles, but he
believes in miracles because he believes in God. If a Realist believes
in God, his realism will necessarily lead him to admit the existence of
miracles also.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account