Russian literature -- 19th century -- History and criticism
That Dostoievsky should have died before finishing this monumental
work which would have been his masterpiece, is a great calamity.
Nevertheless the book is not incomplete in itself: it is a large piece
of life, and it contains the whole of Dostoievsky’s philosophy and
ideas. Moreover, considered merely as a novel, as a book to be read
from the point of view of being entertained, and excited about what
is going to happen next, it is of enthralling interest. This book,
therefore, can be recommended to a hermit who wishes to ponder over
something deep, in a cell or on a desert island, to a philosopher who
wishes to sharpen his thoughts against a hard whetstone, to a man who
is unhappy and wishes to find some healing balm, or to a man who is
going on a railway journey and wishes for an exciting story to while
away the time.
IX
This study of Dostoievsky, or rather this suggestion for a study of
his work, cannot help being sketchy and incomplete. I have not only
not dealt with his shorter stories, such as _White Nights_, _The
Friend of the Family_, _The Gambler_ and _The Double_, but I have not
even mentioned two longer novels, _The Hobbledehoy_ and _Despised
and Rejected_. The last named, though it suffers from being somewhat
melodramatic in parts, contains as strong a note of pathos as is to be
found in any of Dostoievsky’s books; and an incident of this book has
been singled out by Robert Louis Stevenson as being--together with the
moment when Mark Antony takes off his helmet, and the scene when Kent
has pity on the dying Lear--one of the most greatly moving episodes in
the whole of literature. The reason why I have not dwelt on these minor
works is that to the English reader, unacquainted with Dostoievsky,
an exact and minute analysis of his works can only be tedious. I have
only dealt with the very broadest outline of the case, so as to enable
the reader to make up his mind whether he wishes to become acquainted
with Dostoievsky’s work at all. My object has been merely to open the
door, and not to act as a guide and to show him over every part of
the house. If I have inspired him with a wish to enter the house, I
have succeeded in my task. Should he wish for better-informed guides
and fuller guide-books, he will find them in plenty; but guides and
guide-books are utterly useless to people who do not wish to visit the
country of which they treat. And my sole object has been to give in the
broadest manner possible a rough sketch of the nature of the country,
so as to enable the traveller to make up his mind whether he thinks
it worth while or not to buy a ticket and to set forth on a voyage of
exploration. Should such an one decide that the exploration is to him
attractive and worth his while, I should advise him to begin with _The
Letters from a Dead House_, and to go on with _The Idiot_, _Crime and
Punishment_, and _The Brothers Karamazov_; and to read _The Possessed_
last of all. If he understands and appreciates _The Letters from a Dead
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account