Langley Memoir on Mechanical Flight, Parts I and II: Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, Volume 27 Number 3, Publication 1948, 1911Langley, S. P. (Samuel Pierpont)
History
Langley Memoir on Mechanical Flight, Parts I and II: Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, Volume 27 Number 3, Publication 1948, 1911
Langley, S. P. (Samuel Pierpont)
Aeronautics; Flight
In other words, if a curve be constructed whose abscissae represent
extensions, and ordinates the corresponding weights, it will show
a reverse curvature, one portion being concave toward the axis of
abscissae, the other convex.
[19] The following table taken from “Experiments in Aerodynamics,”
p. 107, gives the data for soaring of 30×4.8 inch planes, weight 500
grammes.
-------+-----------------------+-----------------+--------------------+
| | | Weight with planes |
| Soaring speed | Work expended | of like form that |
Angle | ‹V›. | per minute. | 1 horse-power will |
with | | |drive through the |
horizon| | |air at velocity ‹V›.|
α. +-----------+-----------+---------+-------+----------+---------+
| Metres | Feet |Kilogram-| Foot- | Kilo- | Pounds. |
|per second.|per second.| metres. |pounds.| grammes. | |
-------+-----------+-----------+---------+-------+----------+---------+
45° | 11.2 | 36.7 | 336 | 2,434 | 6.8 | 15 |
30 | 10.6 | 34.8 | 175 | 1,268 | 13.0 | 29 |
15 | 11.2 | 36.7 | 86 | 623 | 26.5 | 58 |
10 | 12.4 | 40.7 | 65 | 474 | 34.8 | 77 |
5 | 15.2 | 49.8 | 41 | 297 | 55.5 | 122 |
2 | 20.0 | 65.6 | 24 | 174 | 95.0 | 209 |
-------+-----------+-----------+---------+-------+----------+---------+
The relations shown in the above table hold true only in case of
planes supporting about 1.1 pounds to each square foot of sustaining
area. For a different proportion of area to weight, other conditions
would obtain.
[20] This pressure per unit of area varies with the area itself, but
in a degree which is negligible for our immediate purpose.
[21] See “Internal Work of the Wind”; also Revue de L’Aeronautique,
3^e Livraison, 1893.
[22] More recent experiments under my direction by Mr. Huffaker give
similar results, but confirm my earlier and cruder observations that
the curve, used alone, for small angles, is much more unstable than
the plane.
[23] As stated in the Preface, Part III has not yet been prepared for
publication.
[24] According to Wellner (“Zeitschrift für Luftschiffahrt,”
Beilage, 1893), in a curved surface with 1/12 rise, if the angle of
inclination of the chord of the surface be α, and the angle between
the direction of resultant air pressure and the normal to the
direction of motion be β, then β<α and the soaring speed is
‹V› = √(‹P›/‹K›×(1/(‹F›(α)×cos β)))
while the efficiency is
‹W›/‹R› = Weight/Resistance = tan β
The following were derived from experiments in the wind:
α = −3° 0° +3° 6° 9° 12°
‹F›(α) = 0.20 0.80 0.75 0.90 1.00 1.05
Tan β = 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.10 0.17
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account