Langley Memoir on Mechanical Flight, Parts I and II: Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, Volume 27 Number 3, Publication 1948, 1911Langley, S. P. (Samuel Pierpont)
History
Langley Memoir on Mechanical Flight, Parts I and II: Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, Volume 27 Number 3, Publication 1948, 1911
Langley, S. P. (Samuel Pierpont)
Aeronautics; Flight
Revolutions Velocity of Resistance Resistance Calculated
of turn-table wires. Feet of frame of wires. resistance
per minute. per minute. and wires. R_3−r=r_3. of wires.
Grammes. Grammes.
R_3.
9.25 833 65 37.5 25.2
11.55 1040 91 43.5 39.35
11.55 1040 101 53.5 39.35
15.25 1375 160 75.0 68.7
18.1 1630 203 86.5 96.6
19.25 1735 221 92.0 109.5
19.25 1735 216 87.0 109.5
20.63 1860 237 90.5 125.8
The last column of these tables is calculated for a coefficient of
form equal to 0.5, which has been found to be approximately correct
for a rigid cylindrical body.
These tables are not sufficiently extensive to determine accurately
the exact resistance that wires of various sizes will offer at given
velocities, or to serve as the basis for the deduction of formulæ,
and were not made for that purpose. However, from the above data, and
the curves plotted in Plate 44, it will be seen that some unexpected
results were obtained.
[Illustration: PL. 44
RESISTANCE OF WIRES AT GIVEN VELOCITIES]
[p167]
These results are fairly well summarized in the following general
statements: First, that the coefficient of resistance increases to
some degree as the size of the wire is decreased; second, that in
the case of wires of the size which it was expected to use, and at
approximately the soaring speed of the aerodrome, the resistance
is certainly not greater than 75 per cent, and more probably less
than 50 per cent of the resistance encountered by a flat surface of
the same projected area; third, that the coefficient of resistance
did not seem to be increased by the vibration of the wires. On
the contrary, it was noted during the experiments that when they
reached a speed which just caused them to “sing,” there was a marked
diminution in the resistance. This statement is made, however, with
some reserve, for it is probable that the singing of the wires was
due to vibration in the horizontal plane, and it is not definitely
known what the effect would be of vibration in the vertical plane.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account