Langley Memoir on Mechanical Flight, Parts I and II: Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, Volume 27 Number 3, Publication 1948, 1911Langley, S. P. (Samuel Pierpont)
History
Langley Memoir on Mechanical Flight, Parts I and II: Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, Volume 27 Number 3, Publication 1948, 1911
Langley, S. P. (Samuel Pierpont)
Aeronautics; Flight
“Thus far the dependence for draft has been on the burner jet and
the suction of the smoke-stack in virtue of the inertia of the
moving gases. But even with this ventilated boiler, this method is
limited to certain dimensions of the boiler. Thus a boiler 80 cm.
long yielded about the same quantity of steam as a boiler half as
long and otherwise similar. Only the initial parts of the boiler
are, therefore, relatively efficient, and the reason of this seems
to be that, apart from shape, etc., the flame as a heat-producing
agent is practically defunct, when a certain amount of heat has
been taken out of it: in other words, even with fair ventilation
the flame is eventually chilled off by the voluminous products
of combustion continually accumulating in the boiler. The same
choking action accompanies the presence of unburnt gases. If, for
instance, the flame be burnt in the air, it is slender and much
smaller in volume than in the boiler. The flame is also of small
volume and burns completely in a wide boiler, but the steam is
always deficient, because of the distance between flame and coils
(see above). With the above apparatus about 1/2 lb. of dry steam per
minute per square foot of heating surface was attained.
[Illustration: FIG. 15.]
“This introduces the final condition for rapid steam generation.
There must be artificial suction at the smoke-stack. By passing the
exhaust steam in the form of a central jet through the smoke-stack
the yield of steam was increased 20 to 30 per cent. In fact as the
supply of gas from the burner is given, the artificial suction in
question means more air in the boiler for the same amount of gas
and it means also a more rapid removal of the exhaust gases. The
experiments with steam suction are yet to be completed, and with
them the boiler question is to be finally laid at rest. The chief
points at issue are these:
“1. Seeing that the jet suction increases with the length of the
smoke-stack, up to a certain length at least, how long and how wide
must the efficient smoke-stack be made? Thus a smoke-stack 10 cm.
long is all but useless. Good results are obtained when the stack
measures 30 cm. in length beyond the end of the steam jet. [p075]
“2. What is the relative efficiency of the initial and final halves
of the length of the boiler? This will show in how far it is
useful to increase the length of the boiler for a given burner and
steam jet. It will also show what advantage is to be gained from
triplicate boilers with three burners, as compared with duplicate
boilers with two burners, or single boilers with one burner, ‹when
the same weight› of tubing is used throughout.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account