Latin America: Its Rise and ProgressGarcía Calderón, Francisco
History
Latin America: Its Rise and Progress
García Calderón, Francisco
Latin America
The country was disorganised, its credit in the European markets was
destroyed; its national finances were in disorder. The blood-stained
soil was divided among petty _caciques_; radicalism led to demagogy
and liberty to anarchy. Jacobinism had triumphed with the
Revolution, and condemned the re-election of presidents and the
conservative Senate; the omnipotence of the popular Chamber was
proclaimed. The result was a feeble and ephemeral government; in the
absence of a moderating power the radical Assembly was supreme. A
man was needed to organise chaos; Porfirio Diaz was the necessary
autocrat, the "representative man" of Emerson.
Stern and gloomy, he was preparing for the priesthood. Born in 1830,
he was brought up in poverty. A half-breed, he combined the courage
of the Iberian with the dissimulation of the native. He knew the
efficacy of work, perseverance, and method; he was extremely
ignorant, but was shrewd and perspicacious. He was six times elected
President, for the last time in 1900, and peace was coterminous {158}
with his rule. A great hunter and a master of manly exercises, his
intensity of will-power was supported by solid physical foundations.
Above all he was a man of action; his character was served by a
robust organisation; a powerful frame and a vast power of resistance
enabled him to rule and to intimidate. His intelligence applied
itself to concrete things; it was unable to examine facts in the
transforming light of an ideal; he had no general ideas, no spacious
plans; he was slow in deliberation and rapid in action. His politics
were an organised Machiavellism; like Louis XL, he divided that he
might reign and dissembled that he might conquer. His ideas of
government were simple: "Not much politics and plenty of
administration," said his deeds and his programmes.
Machiavelli, in _The Prince_, taught the means of ruling in states
which have had autonomous governments; he suggested the implacable
extermination of the reigning families. General Diaz followed this
counsel in part. To overcome anarchy he attacked the obscure tyrants
of the provinces, and had them shot or exiled, or else he attached
them to himself by means of honours and rewards. He imposed peace by
means of terror. He knew that order was the practical basis of
progress, as in the formula of Comte, which the Mexicans are fond of
quoting, and this order he firmly established.
The destruction of the revolutionary instinct constituted the
negative side of his work; Diaz built upon this foundation an
industrial republic, practical and laborious. Weary of barren
ideologies, he put the Reformation and its Jacobin doctrines out of
his mind, accepted and encouraged the Yankee influence which had made
Lerdo de Tejada so uneasy, conquered barbarism and the desert by
means of the railway, and raised a number of loans. He was the
president of an industrial epoch.
{159}
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account