Latin America: Its Rise and ProgressGarcía Calderón, Francisco
History
Latin America: Its Rise and Progress
García Calderón, Francisco
Latin America
The Regency was a moderate government which steered clear of
reactionaries and exaltés both, of absolutism and republicanism.
Father Feijó, minister of the Regency, became, like many radicals, a
conservative; he organised the National Guard, suppressed military
meetings and enforced peace in the interior. Subversive movements
continued, and the invulnerable minister repressed them. The
administration {185} of the country progressed, schools were founded,
the Assembly issued wise codes of laws. The Regent, Andrade,
imprisoned and deposed, Diego Feijó was elected tutor of the prince
in 1835; the old radical politician was now dictator. He represented
the moderates as against the revolutionists; in extreme cases he
abandoned liberalism for autocracy. As early as 1836 his political
autocracy began to decline and the liberal campaign gathered force.
Feijó passed over the regency to his friend, Aranjo Lima, and left
the Government. This representative of authority in a country which
was a prey to anarchy was autocratic by virtue of his patriotism;
like all American dictators he stifled revolution in its blood.
The liberals of yesterday are often the moderates or conservatives of
to-day in monarchical Brazil. Andrade, Feijó, and Pereira de
Vasconcellos are examples of this inevitable transformation. Liberty
was the creed of these politicians when they were oppressed by
colonial absolutism, by the servitude anterior to the monarchy and
the Empire; they realised their creed, and the reign of liberal
principles resulted in disorder. The excess of authority or the
excess of anarchy stood in the way of peace and progress. The
political leaders of Brazil swayed from side to side; they were
liberals against despotism and autocrats against demagogy.
In 1840 the infant prince attained his majority; the liberals,
powerful in Parliament, demanded that the Regency should be
terminated. The country longed for internal peace, but discord
between the parties continued. Numerous revolutions disturbed the
country. Minas and Pernambuco, where sedition had passed into a
chronic condition, rose in 1842 and 1848 respectively.
Pedro II. governed with the liberals, but the dangers of excessive
liberalism, of premature democracy, {186} forced him toward
autocracy. He was a learned and sceptical Marcus Aurelius, a stoic
who had read Voltaire. "A simple and modest democrat, losing nothing
of his personal distinction," wrote the historian Ribeiro, "generous
and disinterested, an example of all the domestic virtues, he courted
the respectful sympathy of the crowd rather than popularity."[1] He
was the first republican of Brazil; he presided over a nation in
process of transformation. Before the clash of races, the
revolutionary unrest, and Utopian radicalism his Government
maintained the traditions, reacted against violent reforms, and
favoured the gradual formation of a new world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account