Latin America: Its Rise and ProgressGarcía Calderón, Francisco
History
Latin America: Its Rise and Progress
García Calderón, Francisco
Latin America
Mosquera declared a _Kulturkampf_, separated Church and State, exiled
the bishops, confiscated the goods of the convents, and, like
Guzman-Blanco, {207} created a national Church. Without the
authorisation of the supreme power no priest could exercise his
religious functions. The civil power was the supreme power; the
Church and her ministers were subject thereto.
The President shot or suppressed his enemies, and imposed his policy
by terror; he enthroned militarism. Faithful armies followed him,
accustomed to victory. The domestic policy of New Granada did not
satisfy his ambition; he aspired to restore the Greater Colombia, and
dreamed the dream of Rosas and Santa-Cruz; the hegemony of his
country to be forced upon other peoples. He declared war upon
Ecuador, and was victorious. In 1864 he was followed by another
liberal, Dr. Murillo-Torro. In 1865 the military _caudillo_ resumed
the reins of government. He was hostile to Congress, and proclaimed
himself dictator; he violated the Constitution and the law,
intervened in the struggles of other States, and sought an absolute
and irresponsible authority. His own supporters conspired against
him, and sent him into exile. In Colombia he was the indisputable
authority, as Paez in Venezuela, from 1845 to 1867.
After this long empire came a period of civil Presidents and military
Presidents, who moderated the ambitions of the liberals. Presently a
new _caudillo_ arose: Dr. Rafael Nuñez. Mosquera was first a
conservative, then a liberal. Nuñez, a liberal, fomented a
conservative reaction and dominated Colombian politics for twenty
years.
At one time secretary to Mosquera, he had made a study of the
evolution of great States. He was not only a leader, but also a
diplomatist, and a philosopher in his political disinterestedness,
his lasting moral influence, and the width of his views. A theorist
like Balmaceda and Sarmiento, he none the less did not forget the
inevitable imperfections of {208} Colombia. He became President of
the Senate in 1878, and a minister of the Reformation and head of the
Republic in 1880. Democracy looked to him for a renaissance.
In the heart of the liberal party Dr. Nuñez directed a new
independent group. He had been a radical in 1850, but he departed
from the rigidity of his original beliefs before the persistent
suggestions of experience. Why weaken the executive in an anarchical
nation--why increase the national troubles by the bitterness of
religious warfare? Nuñez became a liberal-conservative; he forgot
his original socialistic principles, the theories of Louis Blanc and
Saint-Simon, and applied a British common-sense to Colombian
politics.[3]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account