Latin America: Its Rise and ProgressGarcía Calderón, Francisco
History
Latin America: Its Rise and Progress
García Calderón, Francisco
Latin America
To this system correspond the political groups without programmes;
men do not struggle for the triumph of ideas, but for that of certain
individuals. The consecrated terms lose their traditional meaning.
There are civilists who uphold militarism; liberals who strive to
increase the presidential authority; nationalists who favour
cosmopolitanism; constitutionalists who violate the political
charter. The personal system groups conservatives and liberals
together. Even in Chili, where the activity of the parties has been
unusually continuous, the older parties have split up into shapeless
factions. The President establishes his despotic authority over the
{369} confusion of these rival groups; he tries to dissolve the small
factions, to divide them, in order to rule them.
Without ideals or unity of action the parties are transformed into
greedy cliques, which are distinguished by the colour of their
favours. As in Byzantium, so in Venezuela, the Blues struggle
against the Yellows, while in Uruguay the Whites oppose the Reds, red
being the distinctive colour of the Argentine federalists. An
aggressive intolerance divides these groups; they gather round their
_gonfaloniere_ and their party symbol in irreducible factions. No
common interest can reconcile them, not even that of their native
country. Each party supports a leader, an interest, a dogma; on the
one side a man beholds his own party, the missionaries of truth and
culture; the other are his enemies, mercenary and corrupt. Each
group believes that it seeks to retain the supremacy in the name of
disinterested virtue and patriotism. Rosas used to call his
opponents "infamous savages." For the gang in possession of power,
the revolutionaries are malefactors; for the latter the ruling party
are merely a government of thieves and tyrants. There are gods of
good and evil, as in the Oriental theogonies. Educated in the Roman
Church, Americans bring into politics the absolutism of religious
dogmas; they have no conception of toleration. The dominant party
prefers to annihilate its adversaries, to realise the complete
unanimity of the nation; the hatred of one's opponents is the first
duty of the prominent politician. The opposition can hardly pretend
to fill a place of influence in the assemblies, or slowly to acquire
power. It is only by violence that the parties can emerge from the
condition of ostracism in which they are held by the faction in
power, and it is by violence that they return to that condition.
Apart from the rule of the _caudillos_ the political lie is {370}
triumphant; the freedom of the suffrage is only a platonic promise
inscribed in the Constitution; the elections are the work of the
Government; there is no public opinion. Journalism, almost always
opportunist, merely reflects the indecision of the parties.
Political statutes and social conditions contradict each other; the
former proclaim equality, and there are many races; there is
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account