Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic HistoryClayton, Joseph
History
Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic History
Clayton, Joseph
Democracy; Great Britain -- History
The divorce from Queen Catherine is the turning point in More’s worldly
fortunes as well as in ecclesiastical affairs in England.
Eighteen years passed from the day of Henry’s marriage to Catherine,
on his accession to the throne, before the divorce was mooted. The
scruple was that Catherine had been formerly betrothed to his dead
brother Arthur; the moving force of Henry’s petition for divorce was
the desire to marry Anne Boleyn. Unable to get the marriage annulled at
Rome, or to get a favourable opinion from the universities, Henry fell
back on Archbishop Cranmer to decree the divorce, and finally this was
done in 1533, all appeals to Rome being henceforth forbidden. Henry
had already, in 1531, called upon the clergy to acknowledge him as the
supreme head of the Church of England, and the following year they were
required to surrender the ancient right to meet and enact canons.[88]
In these four years the chancellor had kept out of political life as
far as he could, and had given his attention to his judicial work. But
in May, 1532, he resigned the great seal into the king’s hands, “seeing
that affairs were going badly, and likely to be worse, and that if he
retained his office he would be obliged to act against his conscience,
or incur the king’s displeasure as he had already begun to do, for
refusing to take his part against the clergy. His excuse was that his
salary was too small, and that he was not equal to the work. Everyone
is concerned, for there never was a better man in the office.”[89]
Nothing is known of Sir Thomas More’s work in the chancery except his
integrity and his despatch. “When More took the office there were
causes that had remained undecided for twenty years. He presided so
dexterously and successfully that once after taking his seat and
deciding a case, when the next case was called, it was found that
there was no second case for trial. Such a thing is said never to have
happened before or since.” (Stapleton.)
For nearly two years More lived unmolested after his resignation of
the chancellorship; but he had incurred the enmity of the king and the
hatred of Anne Boleyn, and Henry was swiftly driving at certain changes
in religion that were to bring Sir Thomas More to the Tower and the
block, and many another honest Christian to the prison and the gallows
of Tyburn.
In June, 1533, after Cranmer had duly pronounced Henry’s marriage with
Catherine void, came the coronation of Anne Boleyn, and Sir Thomas More
declined an invitation from some of the bishops to be present at the
celebration. He knew that his absence would be marked unfavourably by
the king, and was ready to pay the penalty; but his care in avoiding
the expression of any disapproval of Henry’s proceedings required an
equal care that no approval should be expressed. To have been present
at the coronation of Anne would have been, for More, to condone the
divorce.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account