Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic HistoryClayton, Joseph
History
Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic History
Clayton, Joseph
Democracy; Great Britain -- History
The work of Pym and Hampden is conspicuous at the beginning of the Long
Parliament. The Star Chamber and High Commission Courts are abolished.
Ship-money and all enforced taxation unauthorised by parliament are
declared illegal. Oliver Cromwell’s motion for annual parliaments is
amended into an act for triennial parliaments to be called with or
without royal summons. Strafford--the only strong minister Charles
had--perished on Tower Hill in May, both Pym and Hampden supporting
impeachment instead of attainder, and voting for the fallen minister
to be allowed the use of counsel at his trial. That Strafford was a
criminal and a traitor ready to use his Irish army for the suppression
of the English parliament Pym had no doubt.
Still Charles would not admit the position lost, and still struggled
to govern, not through parliament, but by personal rule. The death of
Strafford, though approved by all supporters of the House of Commons,
rallied the king’s friends. The House of Lords was no longer quite at
one with the Commons in the contest. In the House of Commons a royalist
party emerges to oppose Pym, and the beginning of party government
is seen. Overtures are made by Pym to the queen--to be disregarded,
of course; though the tide is setting towards revolution, yet Pym
and Hampden are far from revolutionaries. They are willing to end
the political power of the bishops by turning them out of the House
of Lords, but have only moderate sympathy with the root-and-branch
Puritans who would abolish episcopacy.
In the Grand Remonstrance which Pym laid before the House of Commons in
November, 1641, the case for the Parliament was stated with frankness,
but the demands were not revolutionary. The main points were securities
for the administration of justice, and insistence on the responsibility
of the king’s ministers to parliament. The royalists fought the
Remonstrance vigorously, and in the end it was only carried by a
majority of eleven, 159 to 148. At the end of the debate the excitement
was intense: “some waved their hats over their heads, and others took
their swords in their scabbards out of their belts, and held them by
the pummels in their hands, setting the lower part on the ground.”
Violence seemed inevitable, “had not the sagacity and great calmness of
Mr. Hampden, by a short speech, prevented it.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account