Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic HistoryClayton, Joseph
History
Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic History
Clayton, Joseph
Democracy; Great Britain -- History
In December Lilburne was elected to the common council of the city,
but parliament promptly declared the election void. “Fiercely as
Lilburne attacked Cromwell, there was at times considerable liking
between the two men, and they met on friendly terms before Cromwell
went to Scotland in 1650. Cromwell assured Lilburne of his desire
to make England enjoy the real fruit of all the army’s promises and
declarations,” and friendly relations lasted till Cromwell’s return.
But, in Cromwell’s absence, Lilburne charged Hazlerigg with corruption
in the administration of justice concerning a disputed colliery lease
in Durham, and parliament took up the matter. In January, 1652, it
declared Lilburne’s petition for redress a libel, and imposed a fine of
£7,000 with a sentence of banishment for life.
This proceeding by parliament revived the methods of the Star Chamber
in imposing a conviction and a sentence without trial, but the House of
Commons was determined to stop Lilburne’s activities at all cost.
Cromwell made no effort to hinder the conviction, and Lilburne insisted
that Cromwell’s professions of friendship were hypocritical, and that
the general himself was responsible for the sentence.
For the time Lilburne retired to Holland, where he discussed favourably
the chances of a royalist restoration. But on the expulsion of the
Rump of the Long Parliament the agitator at once wrote off to Cromwell
for permission to return to England, and getting no answer crossed
to London in June, 1653, and settled in lodgings in Moorfields. He
petitioned Cromwell and the Council of State for leave to remain
unmolested, promising to live peacefully, but Cromwell, with the whole
government on his shoulders, had no willingness to incur the risk
Lilburne and his doctrine of popular rights involved to the safety of
the State.
Lilburne was promptly arrested by Cromwell’s order and brought to trial
at the Old Bailey on July 13th. The government case was that he had
returned to England knowing that a sentence of death was decreed by
parliament if he broke his exile.
Lilburne’s defence, in the main, was that the parliament which had
passed sentence was dead, and that if Cromwell had acted justly in
dissolving it, then its unjust actions ought not to be maintained; if
Cromwell had acted unjustly, why was he not punished?
Again the jury acquitted him, and again the people of London expressed
their satisfaction at the verdict, “the very soldiers sent to guard the
court joining in the shouts, and beating their drums and sounding their
trumpets as they passed along the streets to their quarters.”
But “for the peace of the nation” Cromwell would not let Lilburne be at
large. Back in the Tower, then at Guernsey, and then in Dover Castle
for more than two years Lilburne was a prisoner.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account