Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic HistoryClayton, Joseph
History
Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic History
Clayton, Joseph
Democracy; Great Britain -- History
But in spite of great public meetings the movement was already breaking
up. The Chartist Convention, which met in London on May 1st, dissolved
on May 13th in hopeless disagreement, and Ernest Jones, who had
attended as a member of the executive committee, exclaimed that “amid
the desertion of friends, and the invasion of enemies, the fusee had
been trampled out, and the elements of their energy were scattered to
the winds of heaven.” Still he tried to rally the broken ranks, and the
government decided that the time had come to put the movement down by
means of the new “Treason Felony” Act. Feargus O’Connor, now a member,
was no longer dangerous to the authorities. His attendance in the House
kept him from the agitation in the country, and Ernest Jones was the
man to be struck at.
On May 29th and 30th Ernest Jones addressed great, but quite orderly,
meetings in London, on Clerkenwell Green and Bishop Bonner’s Fields,
and then proceeded to Manchester. Here he was arrested and put on trial
with five other Chartists--Fussell, Sharpe, Williams, Vernon, and
Looney. The judge had little patience for the prisoners, and Ernest
Jones was frequently interrupted in his defence. In the end, he and his
fellows were all found guilty of seditious speech, and Ernest Jones was
sentenced to two years’ imprisonment, to find sureties, himself in £200
and two persons in £150, and to keep the peace for five years.
A number of police spies procured many more arrests and convictions by
gaining admission to Chartist meetings, joining Chartist unions and
inciting the members to violent speech and an armed conspiracy. By
these means at the end of the year 1848 the government had succeeded in
getting the prominent Chartists into prison, as it had done in 1840.
That Ernest Jones exhorted his followers to learn to bear arms is
indisputable; that the success of the revolutionary movements on the
continent encouraged the belief amongst a certain number of Chartists
that an armed rising was desirable and could be successful in England
is equally true. But as no serious attempt was made in 1848 by the
“physical force” Chartists to organize such a rising, no rising took
place, and “the conspiracy,” as it was called, was chiefly the work of
the government’s police spies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account