Well, it is hard upon Eginhard to say so, but it is exactly the honesty
and sincerity of the man which are his undoing as a witness to the
miraculous. He himself makes it quite obvious that when his profound
piety comes on the stage, his good sense and even his perception of
right and wrong, make their exit. Let us go back to the point at which
we left him, secretly perusing the letter of Deacon Deusdona. As he
tells us, its contents were
that he [the deacon] had many relics of saints at home, and that he
would give them to me if I would furnish him with the means of
returning to Rome; he had observed that I had two mules, and if I
would let him have one of them and would despatch with him a
confidential servant to take charge of the relics, he would at once
send them to me. This plausibly expressed proposition pleased me,
and I made up my mind to test the value of the somewhat ambiguous
promise at once;[22] so giving him the mule and money for his
journey I ordered my notary Ratleig (who already desired to go to
Rome to offer his devotions there) to go with him. Therefore,
having left Aix-la-Chapelle (where the Emperor and his Court
resided at the time) they came to Soissons. Here they spoke with
Hildoin, abbot of the monastery of St. Medardus, because the said
deacon had assured him that he had the means of placing in his
possession the body of the blessed Tiburtius the Martyr. Attracted
by which promises he (Hildoin) sent with them a certain priest,
Hunus by name, a sharp man (_hominem callidum_), whom he ordered to
receive and bring back the body of the martyr in question. And so,
resuming their journey, they proceeded to Rome as fast as they
could. (Cap. i. 3.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account