Lectures of Col. R. G. Ingersoll - LatestIngersoll, Robert Green
Religion
Lectures of Col. R. G. Ingersoll - Latest
Ingersoll, Robert Green
Free thought
given not spoken of in any of the others, and we find there two men
clad in white apparel, who said: "Men of Galilee, why stand ye here
gazing up into heaven? This same Jesus that was taken up into heaven
shall so come in like manner as ye have seen Him go up into Heaven."
Matthew didn't see that; Mark forgot it; Luke didn't think it was worth
mentioning, and John didn't believe it; and yet upon that evidence we
are led to believe that the most miraculous of all miracles actually
occurred. I cannot believe it.
I may be mistaken; but the church is now trying to parry, and when they
come to the little miracles of the new testament all they say is:
"Christ didn't cast out devils; these men had fits." He cured fits.
Then I read in another place about the fits talking. Christ held a
dialogue with the fits, and the fits told Him his name, and the fits at
that time were in a crazy man. And the fits made a contract that they
would go out of the man provided they would be permitted to go into
swine. How can fits that attack a man take up a residence in swine?
The church must not give up the devil. He is the right bower. No
devil, no hell; no hell, no preacher; no fire, no insurance. I read
another miracle--that this devil took Christ and put him on the
pinnacle of a temple. Was that fits, too? Why is not the theological
world honest? Why do they not come up and admit what they know the
book means? They have not the courage. Now, their next doctrine is
the absolute necessity of belief. That depends upon this: Can a man
believe as he wants to? Can you? Can anybody? Does belief depend at
all upon the evidence? I think it does somewhat in some cases. How is
it that when a jury is sworn to try a case, hearing all the
evidence--hearing both sides, hearing the charge of the judge, hearing
the law, and upon their oaths, are equally divided, six for the
plaintiff and six for the defendant? It is because evidence does not
have the same effect upon all people. Why? Our brains are not
alike--not the same shape; we have not the same intelligence or the
same experience, the same sense. And yet I am held accountable for my
belief. I must believe in the Trinity--three times one is one, once
one is three--and my soul is to be eternally damned for failing to
guess an arithmetical conundrum. And that is the poison part of
Christianity--that salvation depends upon belief--that is the poison
part, and until that dogma is discarded religion will be nothing but
superstition. No man can control his belief. If I hear certain
evidence I will believe a certain thing. If I fail to hear it I may
never believe it. If it is adapted to my mind I may accept it; if it
is not, I reject it. And what am I to go by? My brain. That is the
only light I have from nature, and if there be a God, it is the only
torch that this God has given me by which to find my way through the
darkness and the night called life. I do not depend upon hearsay for
that.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account