Lectures of Col. R. G. Ingersoll, Volume I: Including His Answers to the Clergy, His Oration at His Brother's Grave, Etc., Etc.Ingersoll, Robert Green
Religion
Lectures of Col. R. G. Ingersoll, Volume I: Including His Answers to the Clergy, His Oration at His Brother's Grave, Etc., Etc.
Ingersoll, Robert Green
Free thought
But, they say, God works gradually. No hurry about it. He is not
gradual about keeping Sunday, because, if He met a man picking up
sticks, He killed Him; but in other things He is gradual. Suppose we
wanted now to break certain cannibals of eating missionaries--wanted to
stop them from eating them raw? Of course we would not tell them, in
the first place, it was wrong. That would not do. We would induce them
to cook them. That would be the first step toward civilization. We
would have them stew them. We would not say it is wrong to eat
missionary, but it is wrong to eat missionary raw. Then, after they
began stewing them, we would put in a little mutton--not enough to
excite suspicion but just a little, and so, day by day, we would put in
a little more mutton and a little less missionary until, in about what
the bible calls "the fullness of time," we would have clear mutton and
no missionary. That is God's way. The next great charge against me is
that I have disgraced my parents by expressing my honest thoughts. No
man can disgrace his parents that way. I want my children to express
their real opinions, whether they agree with mine or not. I want my
children to find out more than I have found, and I would be gratified
to have them discover the errors I have made. And if my father and
mother were still alive I feel and know that I am pursuing a course of
which they would approve. I am true to my manhood. But think of it!
Suppose the father of Dr. Talmage had been a Methodist and his mother
an infidel. Then what. Would he have to disgrace them both to be a
Presbyterian. The disciples of Christ, according to this doctrine,
disgraced their parents. The founder of every new religion, according
to this doctrine, was a disgrace to his father and mother. Now there
must have been a time when a Talmage was not a Presbyterian, and the
one that left something else to join that church disgraced his father
and mother. Why, if this doctrine be true why do you send missionaries
to other lands and ask those people to disgrace their parents? If this
doctrine be true nobody has religious liberty except foundlings, and it
should be written over every Foundling Hospital: "Home for Religious
Liberty." It won't do.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account