Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
a French traveller has given an excellent explanation of the matter. The
inhabitants of those countries are to this day shepherds, for agriculture
is scarcely possible there. They kill their cattle, and sometimes cook
the meat, but they also smoke it for the purpose of keeping it, and such
smoked meat they eat raw, which is not done in the other parts of Greece.
Sometimes also they act like the savages in America: they cut the meat
into very thin slices, dry it in the air, and then eat it.
As far back as we can trace history, we always find the AETOLIANS and
CURETES as two nations dwelling by the side of each other in the south of
Aetolia: such is the case in the Iliad. Afterwards the Curetes disappear,
and all the country is occupied by the Aetolians alone. But that country
is only a very small portion of what is subsequently called Aetolia, for
it embraced only the district of Pleuron and Calydon, about the Evenus.
These two towns play as prominent a part in the legends as Mycenae and
Tiryns, and Oeneus and Meleager are as familiar to you as Agamemnon and
Menelaus. This was Aetolia proper, and a truly Hellenic country: from
it proceeded the emigration of Oxylus, which must not be viewed as if
Oxylus had served the Heracleids as a guide and joined them; but the
Aetolian migration to which Elis owed its origin, was an occurrence
quite distinct from the migration of the Dorians into the other parts
of Peloponnesus. The Aetolians farther inland were subsequently joined
by other Pelasgian tribes of Epirus. As early as the Peloponnesian war,
Aetolia was a country of considerable extent, and Thucydides mentions the
Bomians, Ophians (Ophionians), and Eurytanians, as its greatest tribes;
but these names are uncertain, at least the first two. Within these
limits the Aetolians were united during the Peloponnesian war. Their
union may be conceived as a relation of isopolity, in which each nation
formed an independent community, but on certain emergencies they united
and acted as one state. They seem to have met in common sanctuaries, and
to have mutually had the perfect right of isopolity, a connection which
was however extremely loose, and did not oblige the several members to
join one another in offensive operations. In the Peloponnesian war, the
Aetolians resisted the Athenians; they were hostile to Naupactus and
allied with Ampracia[62]; but beyond their own territory they were weak,
and the expedition of the Athenians into Aetolia did the country much
harm. The Aetolians showed themselves equally independent towards the
Spartans, for when the latter, after the battle of Leuctra, wanted to
interfere in their affairs, they were repulsed by the Aetolians. They did
not, however, rise to any importance till after the death of Alexander.
During the latter part of his life, they took Oeniadae, expelled its
inhabitants, and colonised the place anew. Alexander, whose fate was
that of all other conquerors, did not know in the end whither to turn;
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account