Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
The country forms no contrasts, and has no deep valleys with lakes like
Aetolia; it has no high mountains, but is a fertile hilly country, with
alluvial soil, though not to any great extent, on the coast and the
Achelous: the soil is throughout light and good. As regards the political
constitution of the Acarnanians, even Polybius speaks of the κοινὸν τῶν
Ἀκαρνάνων, so that they must have formed a regularly organised state, no
doubt with a common strategus. As far as their manners are concerned, the
same historian classes them among the less civilised tribes, for they
went about in arms. They did not, like the Aetolians, consist of tribes
that were essentially foreign to each other, but of kindred settlers in
towns. Nations which, like the Aetolians, are destined by nature to lead
a pastoral life, cannot have any important settlements in towns any more
than the little cantons of Switzerland; but Acarnania is a thoroughly
agricultural country, producing corn and olives, and towns accordingly
arose from the nature of circumstances; pastoral life prevailed only in
the mountains. These towns had no separate existence independently of
the common government of the state; each of them had no doubt its own
municipal freedom, but in their relation to foreign countries, they were
dependent. This is implied in the term τὸ κοινόν, Latin, _commune_.
In the Peloponnesian war, STRATOS was the capital of the country, but it
was taken by the Aetolians, to whom it belonged in the time of Polybius.
Its walls are still preserved, and they not only show that, as Thucydides
says, it was the largest town of Acarnania, but absolutely a large town
of an astonishing circumference. But these countries are so different
from those of the intellectual Greeks, that no ruins are found attesting
the existence of splendid buildings. Stratos is the only one among the
genuine Acarnanian towns, that deserves to be noticed.
OENIADAE, at the mouth of the Achelous, is often mentioned as an Achaean
town, and its true character is therefore a real puzzle. Xenophon calls
it Achaean, and Scylax of Caryanda applies the name Ἀχαιοί and Ἀχαία to
the whole coast from Cape Rhion as far as the Achelous, so that not only
Oeniadae, but the other coast-towns, as for example, the little Chalcis,
were connected with the Achaeans. Afterwards Oeniadae was taken by the
Aetolians; it recovered indeed its independence, but was then conquered
by the Acarnanians, and finally taken from them by the Romans. Whether on
this last occasion the Achaeans again established their claims, cannot
be ascertained. It is not impossible that it may have been an Achaean
colony, as we find another in Zacynthos.
The Corinthian colonies, the most remarkable of which were LEUCAS,
ANACTORION, ALYZIA, and ACTION, were separated from Acarnania proper at
an early period.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account