Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
The antiquities of Crete are as much a mystery to us as those of ancient
Boeotia and several other countries. Minos is to us a mere name, but
we may believe the statement of Thucydides, that the recollection of
Crete having once ruled over the Cyclades was connected with the
period represented by Minos. But what connection there existed between
Minos and the later Cretans, is a question about which we know nothing
at all. He can scarcely have been a Greek, and the subsequent Greek
population of Crete has no more to do with him than the Tyrrhenians
have with the Etruscans. I am convinced that he was connected only
with the Eteocretans, as is clearly stated by Herodotus. These earlier
Cretans probably continued to live in the island as subjects of the
later inhabitants, and only two of their towns, Praesos and Polichna,
maintained their independence. All the other towns of Crete are Dorian,
Argive, or in general Peloponnesian colonies. What are called the laws of
Minos, unquestionably belong to the Greek immigrants, and if the question
be raised, as to whether the Spartans obtained their laws from Crete, I
do not hesitate for a moment to assert, that the laws of both nations are
originally Doric, and that the Dorian immigrants introduced them among
the Cretans; though the later inhabitants boasted of having preserved the
ancient laws of the conquered original inhabitants. I believe no more in
the historical personality of Minos than I do in that of Lycurgus. We
must not, however, imagine, that the subsequent Cretans were an entirely
new population, for they were in fact only the ruling party. If we
compare the history of different nations we find several instances of
conquerors adopting the name of the conquered people: thus the Spanish
tyrants of Mexico called themselves children of Montezuma; in Peru this
is still more common, though nearly all the Peruvians are hybrids. In
like manner the Dorian conquerors did not go to Crete with their wives
and children, but the later population was descended on the mother’s side
from the ancient Cretans. Those whom we call Ionians, were descended in
the same manner from the Carians.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account