Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
The Cretan towns are spoken of, especially by Aristotle, as if all of
them had had one common constitution (πολιτεία Κρητῶν). Every Cretan
town, even the subject places, seems according to the constitution to
have been equal to the largest; all had a close aristocracy and ruling
houses (a patriciate), and this proves that the country had at one time
been conquered. Their highest magistrates, eligible only from among the
_gentes_, were called κόσμοι; they were five in number, and possessed
despotic power; they seem to have been elected annually. Insurrection
was lawful in Crete, as in Poland, for when the oppression became too
severe, the nobles refused obedience to the magistrates, and elected
new ones. The greatest anarchy was thus legalised, and this was the
consequence of a constitution, which had in itself no organic protection:
a proof of the barbarous character of the people. The Cretans were the
worst of all the Greek nations; they were an object of detestation and
indignation. You remember the expression of St. Paul, in the Epistle
to Titus; their character gave rise to the verb κρητίζειν. Polybius
confirms this judgment with an undisguised hatred of the Cretans,
a hatred which is even stronger than that of the Aetolians. In his
time they were completely devoid of all sense of honour; treason and
faithlessness towards their superiors being no disgrace among them. Thus
they treacherously delivered up the unfortunate Achaeus who had revolted
against Antiochus; they shewed, in fact, all the degeneracy which we now
find among the unhappy Greeks in their enslavement. The Cretans, however,
had no foreign tyranny as a palliation, for no part of Greece remained
so free from foreign oppression, and they never were under the supremacy
of Macedonia, except in the reign of the last Philip, who was chosen
by them as arbitrator; he had, however, no garrison in the island, but
exercised only his personal influence. Crete then remained independent,
and the Romans were altogether indifferent about it. But the pirates of
the Asiatic coasts established themselves among them, and the Cretans
even took part in the trade, whence in A.U.C., 685 they were conquered by
the Romans. In the earlier times they sold their services as mercenaries,
serving as light-armed troops and forming a peculiar kind of infantry.
At their conquest by the Romans, they were chastised, and many of their
towns were destroyed. After this they are no longer mentioned in Roman
history, so that we cannot even say to what province they belonged. It is
only occasionally, when disturbances broke out, that a praetor was sent
to them.
CARPATHOS is situated in the north-east of Crete, towards Rhodes; in the
same direction we have ASTYPALAEA and NISYROS. All three were Dorian
settlements; Carpathos in the end came under the supremacy of Rhodes.
RHODES.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account