Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
Rhodes preserved not only its political independence, but also its great
importance throughout the Macedonian period. At the time when all the
other Greek states were quite servile, and got on only by manoeuvring,
the Rhodians stood forth as a princely people, whose friendship was
courted by kings, and whose enmity was dreaded. While their state was in
this illustrious position, they formed connections with the Romans; they
seem to have entered into friendly relations with them as early as the
fifth century, not long after Alexander’s death, probably on the occasion
of their proceedings against the Etruscan pirates, because both nations
aimed at the same objects, but the Rhodians—and this is a proof of their
great prudence—never concluded a formal treaty with the Romans; their
fleet co-operated with that of Rome, but they undertook no obligations.
Their assistance in the war against Antiochus was liberally rewarded
by the Romans who gave them Caria and Lycia. But the Romans afterwards
harboured ill-feelings towards them, because in their relations with Rome
they shewed a spirit of independence and no servility; hence in the war
against Perseus the Romans tried to interpret every step taken by them
as hostile towards themselves. The Rhodians, it is true, did not wish
for the downfall of Perseus, they no doubt wanted to have an equipoise
in those parts against the Romans, and some men of influence may have
secretly espoused the cause of Perseus; the Romans, moreover, had even
before that time taken back a part of the presents they had made to
them; they had hurt their feelings and so much offended them, that the
Rhodians believed the Romans to be hostile towards them; but they never
really did anything that could be laid to their charge. After the fall of
Perseus, many Romans were impatient to destroy Rhodes; but Cato, though
otherwise not favourably disposed towards the Greeks, was actuated by
such respect for their conduct, that he exerted his whole influence with
the senate to save them. They retained their independence, but became
allies of Rome and lost their subjects; still, however, they shewed
prudence, they were free, and had no Roman commander over them. Eighty
years later, the Mithridatic war afforded the Romans an opportunity of
congratulating themselves for having followed the advice of Cato; for
the Rhodians held out faithfully and heroically against Mithridates,
and did not allow themselves to be prevailed upon by the Thessalians to
enter into an alliance with the king. For this the Romans again rewarded
them with territories. After the murder of Caesar, Cassius who was
unworthy to be the associate of Brutus, took possession of the town of
Rhodes, and treated it very harshly and cruelly. The Rhodians, however,
continued to enjoy their freedom and the esteem of the nations until the
time of Antoninus Pius. At this period we find, from a speech of Aelius
Aristides, that they possessed autonomy, and criminal jurisdiction,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account