Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
The towns on this coast are called τὰ πολίσματα τὰ ἐπὶ Θρᾴκης, or πόλεις
Χαλκιδικαὶ ἐπὶ Θρᾴκης. It is only in an improper sense that we speak of
a country of the name of Chalcidice; wherever that name occurs, it is
incorrect and belongs to a late period. We must not, however, believe
that none but Chalcidian towns existed there; they only formed the
majority; the towns were not even all Greek. Besides the Dorian Potidaea,
there existed Andrian and Eretrian towns, though they were few in number.
But the Hellenic character was communicated to the neighbouring tribes,
not only to the Bottiaeans and Pelasgians of mount Athos, but also to the
Thracians, so that in the time of Philip many places are called Greek,
which at an earlier period did not bear that name. The thirty-two Greek
places on the Thracian coast, so often mentioned by Demosthenes, which
were conquered and destroyed by Philip, cannot be taken as Greek towns
in the strict sense of the term, but there were among them some which
are called by Thucydides δίγλωττοι. I must here notice an error which is
found in most maps, and even in those of D’Anville; namely, Chalcis is
marked as a large town in that district, though not a trace of it occurs
in our authors. It is a mere invention from the name of the Chalcidian
towns, and is based on no better authority than the alleged town of
Magnesia in Thessaly.
POTIDAEA, a Corinthian and the only Doric settlement in that part, is
one of those places, the situation of which is so fortunate, that in
spite of all calamities they always recover. It was conquered by the
Athenians and received cleruchi, who were no doubt expelled by Lysander
like the cleruchi in all the other places; it would appear, however,
that the ancient Corinthian inhabitants who had been scattered in all
directions, scarcely returned at all, and the few who did return became
subjects of Olynthus, with which they afterwards formed a relation of
sympolity. During this period, therefore, Potidaea was insignificant,
and was conquered by the Athenians at the time when they recovered their
maritime power; it was then probably re-conquered by the Olynthians,
and finally came into the permanent possession of Macedonia. It may then
have been destroyed, but it was restored from its ruins by Cassander, and
called CASSANDREA,[78] under which name it was one of the most important
Macedonian cities, and at times was the capital of the whole empire. The
foundation of Cassandrea and the enlargement of Thessalonica shew that
Cassander had a quick eye in discovering the appropriate sites of towns.
It is a remarkable fact that these cities, although for a considerable
time the kings resided in them, still were tolerably independent
republics under the supremacy of the very kings who had founded them.
Under Ptolemy Ceraunus and Lysimachus, Cassandrea was one of the capitals
of Macedonia. After the death of the former, it was separated from
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account