Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
The great town called CHERSONESUS was situated on the promontory of a
small island, as the isthmus could easily be defended by fortifications;
it had an excellent harbour, for which reason it had been chosen as the
site of a colony. The town was a colony of Heraclea in Bithynia, whose
greatness belongs to the period previous to the Mithridatic wars; its
vicissitudes are manifold; it must have been founded after the time of
Herodotus, as he does not mention it. The passage in which he speaks of
those countries, shows that he would have noticed it, if it had existed.
But whenever it may have been founded, it became important at an early
period, and was known under the name of Ἡρακλεία ἐν Χερσονήσῳ, or simply
Χερσόνησος. In consequence of attacks from barbarous tribes, it was
obliged to place itself under the protection of Mithridates Eupator.
This was the beginning of happy times for the Greeks in those parts; the
whole of the Crimea was united under one government, and the barbarians
were excluded by fortifications on the isthmus. The kings of Bosporus,
descendants of Mithridates, governed the peninsula as a splendid little
kingdom under the protection of the Romans, who never introduced their
provincial institutions there, but were satisfied with the recognition
of their supremacy and presents. Under this government the Chersonesus
retained its importance, and when the kingdom of Bosporus was broken up,
Chersonesus, which now assumed the name of _Cherson_, became a republic.
As such it existed not only in the reign of Justinian, when the Romans
protected the inhabitants as their allies and in that of the descendants
of Heraclius, but even afterwards under Constantine Porphyrogenitus (see
his detailed article Χερσῶν in the work _De Administrando Imperio_).
The constitution of this republic cannot be satisfactorily ascertained,
but its magistrates were called πρωτεύοντες. The place was then still
Greek, and Greek was spoken there, and national chronicles were kept in
the Greek language, which the author of the work just mentioned made
use of. Afterwards the peninsula was taken by the Russians under their
prince Wladimir, the first great conqueror who aimed at the possession
of Greece. The town was not indeed destroyed on that occasion, but many
things of value were carried away, as for example, the bronze gates of
the churches. Soon after, the Chazars and other barbarians came and
took possession of the town, which then disappears from history. In
1784, when the Russians took the Crimea, the town no longer existed, but
only extensive ruins. Regular and systematic excavations might have led
to important discoveries, but the Russians built a harbour for their
navy; everything was rudely demolished for the purpose of using it as
building material; all the iron was torn away, and the bricks employed
elsewhere, so that at present not a trace appears of what forty years ago
promised certain reward for suitable exertion. Inscriptions, as far as I
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account