Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
We shall speak of Epirus in its narrower sense. Its new and narrower
frontiers were formed especially at the time when the great Pyrrhus
became king of Epirus, and when the kingdom founded by him gained
consistency. In later times it was of a still more limited extent. As
those tribes, when they did speak Greek, spoke in the Doric dialect,
they called themselves Ἀπειρῶται, as we see from their coins, both
regal and republican. This form also remained the most familiar to
the Romans, and has been preserved down to our own time in the word
_apricots_ (_mala Apirotica_); in like manner, we find in Plautus _Alis_
and _Alii_ for _Elis_ and _Elii_. Later writers indeed used _Epirus_
and _Epiroticus_, but these are changes of the literary language, while
the genuine and more ancient form continued to be used in the popular
and spoken language. The Epirots must also have had a real national
name of their own; and this name has been preserved by Mnaseas, a pupil
of Aristarchus, in a scholion on the Odyssey. It was Siceli, like that
of the Oenotrians in Italy, and of the inhabitants of Sicily. I have
published a short essay on this subject in the _Rheinisches Museum_,[86]
and have shown that the Siceli mentioned in the Odyssey must be those of
Epirus, that the ancient grammarian is perfectly right in this respect,
and that for this reason the last rhapsody of the Odyssey is of quite a
different origin from the rest. Satisfactory results in the higher kind
of criticism, regarding the age of authors, may be arrived at in many
cases either by mere grammatical, or by mere historical philology, but
it is infinitely better if both can be combined, and such is the case
here, the one supporting the other. Bentley’s investigations on the
Epistles of Phalaris and the Fables of Aesop are models of inquiries, in
which historical and grammatical philology go hand in hand. Much that is
excellent has already been done for the Homeric poems; but there is still
much to be removed, and all the details must be treated of in connection
with one another. I am not speaking here of that which has already been
done by Wolf.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account