Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
Previous to the time of Themistocles, Piraeeus was a scarcely inhabited
coast district; its natural advantages were neglected, because this
port was farther off than that of Phalerus, the latter being two or
three miles nearer the city; the few galleys which Athens possessed, and
most of which had no decks, were in Phalerus. Themistocles, with the
keen eye of a great man, selected Piraeeus as the site of a new town,
and his intention was to induce the Athenians to abandon their city
altogether and to settle in Piraeeus, which he intended to surround with
walls of immense height and to fortify in such a manner as to render it
impregnable by the arts of war as they were at the time. The wall, which
was actually built, had only half the height to which he intended to
raise it, and yet, until the time of Sulla, it defied every attack upon
it. The thought of abandoning the place in which the citizens had lived
honourably for centuries, was too painful to their feelings to be carried
into effect. After the battle on the Hellespont, in the Peloponnesian
war, such fortifications of Piraeeus could, after all, not have saved
Athens, though at other times they would have been of great advantage,
and might, perhaps, have exercised an influence upon the course of the
Peloponnesian war. The second great plan, the building of the μακρὰ
σκέλη, partly supplied this advantage, which they might have enjoyed at
less expense.
The circumference of Piraeeus was nearly seven English miles: its nature
and topography are the great problem for archaeologists. We can indeed
conceive that, as we read in the ancients, it had three large harbours,
but two of them are now choked up. Such deposits of sand are frequent in
those parts of the coasts of the Mediterranean, where the current is not
very strong.
The most difficult, nay, almost impossible, problem, is that of
determining the site of _Munychia_. It is described as a peninsula almost
surrounded by the sea, near Piraeeus, and as connected with the main land
only by a narrow isthmus; it is further said to have been a very strong
post; but as yet we have no correct drawing of it, and no description or
statement leads us to the discovery of the site of Munychia; though we
might fancy that such an eminence could not be mistaken. Strabo describes
the place in the above manner, and beyond that we know nothing of it. If
a person, intimately acquainted with the ancients, were to examine the
localities, he might perhaps make some discoveries. Piraeeus was built
along the shore, and surrounded on the landside by the great wall of
Themistocles; but whether Munychia was situated within that wall, or was
built against it like a citadel, no one can say: our topographers always
regard it as a part of Piraeeus, but there can be no doubt, that the
historians always distinguish the two places.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account