Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
The country there is indescribably beautiful and charming, and besides
Baiae, the lake AVERNUS, surrounded by very ancient forests, is likewise
a spot of great interest. Near it, a road has been cut through the rock
leading to Cumae. Such roads were often constructed for the purpose
of shortening the distance and avoiding the heights, for the Romans
generally endeavoured by every means to shorten the roads. A similar
road leads from Naples to Puzzuoli, likewise made to avoid a hill, which
it would be very difficult to cross: hence the _crypta Pausilippana_,
_Puteolana_, _Neapolitana_.[43] The Avernus was, no doubt, originally
called ἄορνος, and with the digamma ἄϝορνος. This etymology has been
rejected, because it implied the statement that birds could not fly over
the lake, which, it is said, is an absurdity. But no bird settles there
without dying in consequence, on account of the quantity of carbonic
acid which is exhaled by the earth and the lake; dogs, too, are not safe
there, but men may pass without any danger.
NAPLES[44] was originally called PARTHENOPE, and was, no doubt, situated
on mount Posilipo, towards Nisita, where the crypta turns towards the
cape. Afterwards, NEAPOLIS was built a few miles from it on the other
side of the cape; and it is a mistake to believe that the two places
were nearer each other. Parthenope was a colony of the Eretrians of
Ischia, while Neapolis was a Cumaean settlement with an admixture of
Athenians; and after the establishment of the latter place, Parthenope
was called PALAEPOLIS. In the second Samnite war, Palaepolis was taken
by the Romans, and must have been destroyed, for it entirely disappears;
Neapolis, on the other hand, became a federate town of Rome, and was
treated with kindness. Strabo, however, relates, that the town was
so much distracted by internal disturbances, as to be obliged to
concede the franchise even to the Campanians, its natural enemies. But
notwithstanding all this, it remained a perfectly Greek city until the
imperial times; this is evident in the reign of Augustus, evident from
a letter of the emperor M. Aurelius to Fronto, and evident, also, from
Petronius; there exists, moreover, a great number of Greek inscriptions
of the third century. Afterwards, we lose our thread. But the chapel
of the ancient church of S. Rosa at Naples contains Greek inscriptions
of the period when Naples was a free city, under the protectorate of
Byzantium, that is, of the seventh or eighth century.[45] Traces of Greek
words still exist in the Neapolitan dialect. The Italian word _golf_ is
evidently formed from κόλπος; the gulf of Naples is specially called
_the_ gulf; but the ancients also called it κρατήρ.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account