Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
The four Sabine tribes of the upper confederation occupied the country
from the hills, which form the watershed between the Liris and the
Vulturnus, to the Adriatic. They formed together one confederate state,
and their connection is repeatedly alluded to in our authorities, as, for
example, in Polybius, where he enumerates the Italian contingents levied
against the Cisalpine Gauls; and in Ennius where we read _Marsa manus,
Peligna cohors, Vestina virum vis_. At the time when the Vestinians
declared for the Samnites, and the Romans wished to overcome them by a
sudden attack, Livy remarks that the Romans ought to have considered
that, by attacking the Vestinians, they would also make the Marsians,
Marrucinians, and Pelignians their enemies. They were united as a
confederation, in the same manner as the Romans were united with the
Latins and Hernicans. In regard to origin, they were the same as the
far ruling Samnites, but in their political system they were entirely
different from them. Once only, in the second Samnite war, they hesitated
as to whether they should not join the Samnites against the Romans;
but the latter succeeded in preventing it. It was the consequence of
the fatality by which the Romans were destined to become the rulers of
Italy, that the Marsians began to move during the interval between the
second and third Samnite war: it was then a piece of folly on their
part, which they had reason bitterly to repent; they ought to have done
so before, and to have joined the Samnites. They were subdued and had
to submit to hard terms, though afterwards the Romans again placed them
in an honorable position, in which they remained until the outbreak
of the great Marsian or Social War. There existed various causes, why
they separated themselves from the Samnites, so that the latter did not
obtain the support which, had the others not been infatuated, ought
to have been given to them. It has often been observed, that people
of quite different religions do not hate one another as much as those
belonging to different sects of the same religion, even though their
differences should be slight, nay the more trifling the differences are,
the bitterer is their hatred. Thus, e.g., in France the Jansenists and
Jesuits, as they are called, are more embittered against each other,
than either of them is against the Calvinists; the united and non-united
Armenians are enraged against each other, though their difference is
only a formal one not affecting their dogmas. The Samnites and the other
tribes were one nation, but the Samnites had become great, and hence
the unfortunate envy and jealousy of their less powerful kinsmen. This
is the chief reason, why they formed friendship with the Romans. They
had, however, another reason besides, which afforded them a specious
pretext, and draws a veil over the odiousness of their conduct. They were
mountaineers and a pastoral people, who, during winter, required pastures
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account