Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
from the Volscians, but was afterwards likewise taken possession of by
the Romans. In like manner we find Sora, and even Casinum, in the hands
of the Samnites. The case of the latter town is mentioned by an author in
whose work we should hardly look for it, and yet it is a statement which
ought not to escape the notice of an historian. The historical inquirer
must also examine the grammarians whose works contain facts of the
greatest historical importance in fragments and accidental quotations.
Such is the case, e.g., in the commentary of Servius and the scholiast
on Juvenal;[51] it is, however, not only in writers of this class and in
Festus that we may expect historical statements, but we find them in the
authors of real grammars, such as Nonius, Diomedes, and Priscian; they
contain much that is of value and ought not to be despised. Such also is
the case here, for it is Varro who, in his work “De Lingua Latina,”[52]
states, that Casinum was inhabited by Samnites. Hence we see that they
extended as far as the neighbourhood of Arpinum and Monte Cassino, and
that they had subdued the whole district between the upper Vulturnus and
the upper Liris. It was, therefore, for the purpose of extending their
dominion in that part, that they undertook the war against the Sidicines.
The Samnites, as we have seen, did not form a compact nation, they were
not united by one capital, they had no permanent government to keep
the whole together, and they formed no _civitas_, but a _populus_,
not a πόλις, but an ἔθνος. They consisted of four or five different
tribes, which were not more closely united with one another than the
Romans, Latins, and Hernicans, or even not more closely than the Romans,
Latins, and Volscians of Ecetrae were at various times. Thus it happened
that the Frentanians, though a Samnite people, concluded, during the
second Samnite war, a separate peace with Rome and allowed her armies a
passage through Abruzzo into Apulia. Velleius Paterculus states, that
on one occasion the Romans were defeated by the Caudines alone, and in
the Triumphal Fasti we read, that a general triumphed _de Samnitibus
omnibus praeter Pentros_. So long as the Romans stood on a footing of
equality with the Latins and Hernicans, the Samnites were able to keep
them within due bounds; but when they themselves had assisted the Romans
in reducing the Latins to the condition of subjects, the compactness
of the Roman state was against them, and they were no longer equally
matched. No wonder, therefore, that they succumbed to the Romans; but
it is surprising to find that, after all, they were able to hold out in
a struggle like the second Samnite war, which lasted twenty-four years
and a half. And notwithstanding this, they rose again with the force of
despair, which hopes for nothing and destroys its own existence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account