Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
The destruction of Sybaris by the Crotoniats was the death-blow to the
Greek towns in those parts, for the Crotoniats were not able to protect
the country against the invading Lucanians and Oenotrians. Some of the
surviving Sybarites withdrew to their colonies of Laos and Scidros, and
others built a small place of the name of Sybaris in a distant part; all
attempts to rebuild the ancient city failed, for Croton and the vengeance
of the emancipated serfs prevented it. In this distress they applied to
the Athenians, who in the days of their greatness appear everywhere as
the defenders of the Hellenic name: on this occasion, too, they were
ready to assist the unfortunate Sybarites, and invited colonists from
all parts of Greece to settle at Sybaris. The reason why Croton did not
oppose this new settlement may have been the fact, that the people of
the interior were advancing more and more; the Crotoniats probably felt,
that a powerful Greek colony in the neighbourhood might be very useful
to them: Posidonia, too, was probably already lost. At a deliberation
of the Spartans and their allies, a Greek said, that if Athens were
destroyed, “the spring would be taken out of Hellas,”[56]—the destruction
of Sybaris had taken the spring out of Magna Graecia. The settlement at
THURII succeeded without any opposition on the part of the Italicans.
It was called an Athenian colony; but the Athenians formed only a small
portion of the population, which consisted of Dorians and Ionians,
islanders as well as emigrants from the mainland, who had been invited by
the Athenians, without any distinction, as to a general Greek enterprise;
the Athenians did not reserve for themselves any petty advantages,
being satisfied with the consciousness that history would call them the
restorers of Sybaris. Thurii must have been a strong colony, whence
it soon rose to importance. The ancient name was probably ominous, as
Sybaris had been destroyed twice, or perhaps even three times. The name
Thurii is said to have been derived from a well. This is possible; but
the emblem of Sybaris on ancient coins (for there are some very ancient
ones) is always a bull, whence it is quite possible, that this emblem may
have been the cause of the name, for θούριος signifies _ferox_, fierce,
wild. Thurii soon became involved in constant wars with the Lucanians;
but fifty or sixty years after its foundation it was already so powerful
that it could lose more than 10,000 men in battle against the Lucanians.
This loss, however, was a blow from which it never could thoroughly
recover; it was soon after confined to its own territory, and perhaps
even obliged to pay tribute to protect itself against the devastations
of the Lucanians. In the wars of the Tarentines and the other Greeks
against the Lucanians, Thurii is indeed still mentioned, but it sank more
and more, until in the end it was taken and plundered by the Lucanians.
Afterwards, it placed itself under the protection of the Romans, who,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account