Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
Down to the middle of the fourth century, the country beyond the
Apennines was called northern Etruria, but after that time it bore the
name _Gallia Cisalpina_ or _Togata_, but it extended further than Etruria
proper, for the sea-coast as far as the river Aesis never belonged to
Etruria.
The country now called Lombardy in its narrower sense, was inhabited
in the earliest times by Ligurians, as is clear from most indubitable
indications, and hence we must suppose, that subsequently they were
driven by the Etruscans across the Ticinus. But these events belong
to too remote an epoch, and I cannot say much either of this or of
the Etruscan period. Certain it is that Etruscan towns existed in
those parts, and that Etruscans dwelt there as the conquerors of the
Ligurians and as the lords of the land; and there can be no doubt that
after descending from the Alps the Etruscans established their first
settlements there. _Melpum_ is said to have been a great Etruscan
settlement in the neighbourhood of Milan; and _Felsina_ (Bononia),
_Mutina_, _Parma_, and _Brixia_, are spoken of in the same way. _Verona_
is sometimes called Raetian and sometimes Etruscan, and _Mantua_ is
called Etruscan by Virgil. It is possible that Verona may have been
termed Raetian because it was situated on the Raetian frontier, and may
for all this have been an Etruscan town.
The immigration of the Gauls into those parts is assigned by Livy in a
most unhistorical manner to the time of Tarquinius Priscus; he has no
other reason for it than the very legendary connection supposed to have
existed between this emigration of the Gauls, and the settlement of the
Phocaeans at Massilia. There is much more probability in the statement,
that not long before the attack upon Rome by the Senones, the Gauls had
first poured down upon all Italy in great masses. This is supported by
the express testimony of Polybius, that they had shortly before come
across the Alps, and also by the tradition that they took Melpum in the
same year in which Veii was taken by Camillus (358). Just at that time,
the Etruscans on quitting Veii seem to have turned their attention to an
object of greater interest in a different direction. About that same time
the Gauls appear in Slavonia and Lower Hungary, where they stirred up the
Triballians, and according to an ancient tradition the Gauls migrated
at the same time across the Alps and across the Rhine. They evidently
marched into Italy through Switzerland, which may previously have been
inhabited by quite different tribes. The ruins on the Ottilienberg in
Alsace have a complete Etruscan appearance; they strongly resemble the
fortifications of Volaterrae, and are situated on the plateau of a hill:
they are altogether foreign to the Celtic character; the Celts had
nothing of the kind. The supposition of the antiquarians of Alsace, ever
since the time of Schoepflin, that, as those ruins are not Celtic, they
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account