Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
south of France, on the other hand, as far as it was once inhabited by
Aquitanians, Iberians, and Ligurians, the people speak Provençal, while
the north of France, which was once inhabited by Celts, has a different
dialect. This Romano-French, which has grown on Celtic ground, extends
all over Savoy as far as Aosta, and shows that the country was originally
inhabited by Celts. The Alpine tribes in those parts were not completely
subdued until the time of Augustus. During the period of the decline of
the Etruscans, the Ligurians spread far into the interior of Tuscany;
and soon after the Hannibalian war, the Romans came in collision with
them, not because they had offended the Romans, but the latter only
wanted to gain a passage through their country to Spain. I have already
observed that physically we can distinguish the countries once inhabited
by Etruscans and Ligurians, and a greater contrast can scarcely exist. In
Etruria the powerful cities ruled as sovereigns over all the neighbouring
places and extensive territories; the Ligurians, on the other hand, were
absolutely democratic, and had scarcely any towns. A port town like Genoa
was a small place, but otherwise they lived in villages on the hills
and in the valleys; the equality subsisting among them has no parallel
anywhere except in modern Europe. They had no slaves; all were thoroughly
free, and the Ligurian, working in the sweat of his brow, performed as a
free labourer the services which were elsewhere the work of slaves. This
difference in character is clearly manifested in the kind of resistance
offered to the Romans by the Etruscans and by the Ligurians. For the
same reason Charlemagne found it infinitely more difficult to subdue
the Saxons and Frisians, for they were free people, and although there
were some serfs among them, yet freedom had never been really crushed.
The Turingians, on the other hand, who ruled over extensive territories,
in which the ancient inhabitants had become serfs, were conquered at a
blow; so also the Alemanni, who possessed a large country extending as
far as the lower Rhine: they had no basis. As they ruled over serfs, the
greater part of the population was foreign and hostile to them. On the
other hand, it took centuries to subdue the Obotritae and Slavonians,
who defended their own independence. Such, also, was the case of the
Ligurians: they consisted of a large number of small tribes, which
unfortunately defended themselves each separately. If they had kept
together, they would have been invincible, for each of them held out with
the most determined perseverance. Their misfortune makes one’s heart
ache: they were crushed by the Romans one by one, just as a strong wall
is demolished piece by piece. The conquerors were obliged to transplant
them into foreign countries; and one of their tribes is said by Pliny to
have been transplanted thirty times, in order to break up all connection
among them. Many thousands of them were led into southern Italy, and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account