Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
Although the Syracusans are not among those Greeks who excite our
sympathy for them in the highest degree, yet their history is one of
the most melancholy in ancient times. The whole of Greek history is
very saddening in its course, but none more so than that of Syracuse,
and if we seriously contemplate it, it is heartrending. The Syracusans
throughout show a lawlessness which rendered them incapable of governing
themselves; their only salvation was a mild usurper, as, for example,
the last Hiero; he was a mild and kindly man, although even he did
things which make us shudder; but this was natural in the case of Greek
usurpers. The history of Syracuse begins with an aristocratic form of
government, the first settlers ruling over a considerable territory, and
the ancient inhabitants having become serfs (κιλλικύριοι). Servitude
afterwards disappears, and a demos is formed, which is increased by new
settlers from all parts of Greece, and has to struggle with the lords of
the soil (γάμοροι). Gelo, one of these lords, put himself at the head of
the demos, and for the sake of appearances established a democracy, but
set himself up as tyrant. Under Hiero, Syracuse was extremely prosperous;
with him the tyrannis ceased and democracy was restored, but was found
wanting as soon as it was put to the test, and a struggle gradually
arose between the wealthy few and the multitude. During this struggle
there arose Dionysius I., an ambitious man, not a benefactor of the
people, though he was useful in several respects, for the people could
not do without a ruler. He was succeeded by his unworthy son, quite a
detestable person; it was now impossible to live without a usurper,
but it was equally impossible to endure him. The distressing condition
became worse in consequence of the unsuccessful undertaking of Dion,
respecting whom Plato was so singularly mistaken, and whom he regarded
in the light of his own ideal of what a man should be. Timoleon, a
really great man, expelled Dionysius by force, and restored happiness
and prosperity to the city for a period of twenty years. He ruled solely
by his personal authority, and the people, for once, were grateful to
him. After his death, fresh divisions arose, and Agathocles, a bold
but oriental miscreant of unprincipled impudence, usurped the supreme
power. Under his dominion of Syracuse became great and brilliant, but not
prosperous: it was fearfully ill used; it became a den of robbers, and
mercenaries of every description deluged the city with torrents of blood.
Long protracted, and devastating internal wars then followed, after which
came the more than fifty years’ reign of Hiero, during which Syracuse was
confined to a small territory. It often ruled over the whole island; but
the state of things was ever changing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account