Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
We have thus rapidly passed along the whole coast from the Baetis to
the Pyrenees; but in the valley of the Ebro I have still to notice
CAESARAUGUSTA (Saragoza). Spain is the real country of the great and
flourishing military colonies of the Romans; Gaul had but few of them,
such as Cologne, which, however, was of a mixed character, as Germans
there dwelt together with the veterans. Cologne and Lyons were national
towns rather than real military colonies of the Romans; but those in
Spain were pure military colonies, differing from those of Italy in the
fact that the latter, with the exception of Placentia and Cremona, were
established in towns which had existed before, whereas those in Spain
consisted of newly-built towns. These foundations of towns belong to the
age of Augustus and his successors. Augustus evidently had a twofold
object in view, first to reward his veterans, and secondly to Romanise
the Spaniards. The population in those parts had been almost annihilated
during the unfortunate wars, and hence Augustus sent out whole legions
to establish themselves there. In this manner arose _Emerita Augusta_,
the modern Merida, which must have been an immensely large town, for it
contained the veterans of three legions. He gave them extensive estates,
so that the territory of the town must have been a whole province,
and the ancient inhabitants could not possibly till their lands. The
veterans became the lords of the soil. Caesaraugusta was a town of
this kind. Augustus was a distinguished man, whatever we may think of
him; in regard to intellect and talent we may rate him very low, and
I believe that he even deserves to be ranked lower than is generally
done; but he was a ruler of great ability; and the fact that the time
in which he lived was deplorable and full of confusion, must not induce
us to be unjust towards him. The age in which he lived was morally bad,
but the cause of this lay in the period which preceded it, just as the
horrors of the French revolution must be set down to the account of
those who had the power in their hands before it broke out; had these
men been better, the ferment of the dregs of the people would have met
with quite a different resistance. But the whole fabric was rotten and
in a state of dissolution. In like manner the age of Augustus was bad,
because it was the offspring of a bad and corrupt period. It was as
impossible to save the Roman republic, as it was to restore the republic
of Florence after the reign of Alexander de Medici. The men who had
conspired against Caesar may have been the best and noblest, but they
were extremely unwise, they ought to have taken into account the actual
circumstances. Alcmaeon, the profound Pythagorean, says, that men perish,
if they do not understand how to fit the beginning to the end.[68] This
is very frequently the case in history; and hence the noblest endeavours
often lead to unfortunate results. The regulations of Augustus for the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account