Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
The Celts may have had much in common with the Cymri, but their
constitution was peculiar to them; we have no proof to show that what
Caesar says about them also applies to the Belgae. The existence of an
aristocratic constitution, which, in the case of many other nations is
assumed only from misinterpreted expressions, cannot be doubted among the
Celts. We find among them two ruling tribes, the knights and the priests,
the well-known Druids; the rest of the people were mere serfs. This
circumstance, as I have observed on other similar occasions, intimates
that the Celts, in the countries where we know them, were conquering
foreigners, and that the power which drove them out of Spain, led them
into a country, where, in their turn, they subdued other people. My
conjecture is, that this latter people, extending over nearly the whole
of France, was no other than the Cymri, who, being pressed by the Celts,
advanced northward, and threw themselves upon German tribes; and this
circumstance produced the mixture of Belgae and Germans in the north.
It is well known that the Druids were a caste,[71] but it is impossible
to ascertain whether the Druids and knights were two different castes,
like the Brahmins and warriors in India, or whether the Druids were only
a branch of the military caste, which occupied itself with matters of
religion. Certain it is, however, that all the power was divided between
these two, while the people lived in a condition which Caesar describes
by the term _clientela_, that is, bondage. It was not exactly what we
call serfdom; for the Celtic people were dependent only in relation to
their feudal lords, whose retinue they formed, but in other respects they
were free; and besides them, slaves are expressly mentioned.
The religion of the Druids was bloody and cruel, and for this reason it
was the only one that was attacked by the Romans; though they may have
done so also because that religion formed an obstacle to the Romanising
of Gaul. Success was not difficult, and the Druids were completely
crushed. It is possible that some of the later commotions of which we
read in Tacitus, as, e.g., those of Sacrovir and Classicus, may have been
connected with religion. The Druids also were the depositories of a kind
of science and literature, for they had poems which it was unlawful to
commit to writing. In the transactions of ordinary life, they used the
Greek alphabet.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account