Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
The towns in Britain are not of any great historical importance;
_Camalodunum_ alone ought perhaps to be mentioned. _London_ shows how
successful the Romans were in selecting sites for towns. Tacitus, when
speaking of the people in the south-west of England, says that they
resembled the Spaniards, and he suspects that they were of Spanish
origin. It is not impossible that Iberians may have spread as far as
those districts, but whether there be any foundation for this opinion
or not cannot be decided, for all historical traces are lost. It is
possible, however, that there may have been a tradition, that the Gauls,
who had conquered the north of Spain, were afterwards expelled from
it; in this case we should be obliged to suppose that the Gauls, when
driven out of Spain, arrived in Britain by sea. With few exceptions, all
the stories of the middle ages relating to ancient times are devoid of
historical value. The tradition of Irish chronicles—that their ancestors
came from Spain—though it is interwoven with a tissue of fables, may yet
not be altogether without some foundation. In the British legends, on
the other hand, there occur stories, as if in the time of the Romans the
country had been governed by native kings. English antiquaries, attaching
too much weight to these stories, have imagined that Britain was a kind
of feudal kingdom under the supremacy of Rome, whereas, in truth, it was
governed like every other province.
CELTIC NATIONS ON THE EAST OF THE RHINE.
In order to complete the account of the Gallic race, let us turn our
attention to the eastern banks of the Rhine. Caesar and Tacitus speak of
Gauls dwelling in southern Germany, and expressly state that they spoke
Gallic. One of these nations is the _Aravisci_; another the _Boii_,
probably in Bohemia, but elsewhere also. These Boians appear as a great
people on the Danube as well as in Italy, whereas in Gaul itself there
are but few traces of them. No one can deny emigration in this instance,
where a nation diverges in two opposite directions, the one dwelling
on the north, and the other on the south of the Alps. The Boians were
afterwards extirpated, and that probably by the Cymri. The _Norici_ in
Carniola and Carinthia, are likewise mentioned as Gauls under Gallic
kings; after the period of the Hannibalian war, about the time of the
foundation of Aquileia, they were on terms of friendship with the
Romans. They occupied the country from the frontiers of Italy as far
as the Danube, but were not connected on their Italian frontier with
the other Gallic tribes, being separated from them by the Raetians and
Vindelicians. In the east, however, they were connected with a succession
of Gallic tribes, and probably in the west also, that is, in the north
of the Vindelicians and of the Danube. The _Vindelici_ were a Liburnian
people, north of the Raetians at the foot of the Brenner, and probably
in Bavaria also; but their frontier on the northern slope of the Alps
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account