Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
The northernmost gate is the _Porta Collina_, near the Quirinal, where
the mound of Servius Tullius began. Before it there is a field, and then
comes the valley across which you pass through the gardens of Sallust
towards Monte Pincio. Here, on the road to the Porta Salara[13], we must
conceive the point where Hannibal rode up to the walls of Rome, and
hurled his spear into the city, and where Sulla defeated the Samnites.
The _Porta Esquilina_ was at the other end of the Servian agger, and
between them was the _Porta Viminalis_. Ficoroni has very successfully
made out the site of the Porta Esquilina behind the church of S. Maria
Maggiore. After the Esquiline gate there follows the _Caelimontana_, the
site of which cannot be accurately determined; but that the arch on the
Caelius with an inscription by Dolabella[14], is not a Roman gate, is
obvious to any one who has a notion of the structure of a Roman gate.
Then comes the _Porta Capena_, in the valley below the Caelius. Piranesi,
an intelligent and clever man, discovered it about fifty years ago by
well conducted excavations; but the spot has been covered over again, and
not even a mark has been put there. Then follows the _Porta Naevia_ near
the Aventine, whether on the side towards the Caelius, or at the southern
extremity, on the spot where now the bulwark of Paul III. exists, cannot
be ascertained. This gate is the largest. In order to discover any thing
more definite about it, it would be necessary to make excavations, and
it would have made me extremely happy, if I had been allowed to do so.
But gladly as I would have done it, even at my own expense, I had to
struggle with too great difficulties, especially caused by Monsignor Fea,
who always had some objection, when a proposal was made, although he had
no certain conviction of his own. He generally thwarted my attempts.
When once by accident he consented to Count Funchal making excavations
on the Capitol, the thing sought for was found. He never would be wrong,
though he is otherwise an honest man, and has the reputation of great
disinterestedness; but he is arrogant, confident, and impertinent; he
becomes enraged, and never allows a matter to be inquired into, and to
prevent it he would even have recourse to intrigues and tricks. Thus,
although I wished to make excavations at my own expense, and although I
offered to take nothing for myself, and to surrender every thing to the
Papal government—I only wished to copy what I might find—still I could
not obtain permission. And this was done, in order that new discoveries
might not overthrow the current theories. But I understand that things
are now going on better.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account