Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
This may suffice in regard to the Forum Romanum or Maximum. The word
Forum originally, as is stated by the ancient lexicographers, signified
“hollow ground;” but afterwards it assumed the same meaning as ἀγορά, and
thus presupposes an open space. In later times the meaning underwent so
strange a change, that the Fora, e.g., the Forum Ulpium or Trajani, were
not open spaces at all, but places wholly covered with buildings. Of the
same kind were the Fora of Nerva and Domitian. The same must be supposed
to have been the case even with the Forum of Caesar; in regard to that of
Augustus, it may appear doubtful, as to whether a portion of it was not
an open space. This change arose from the fact, that the idea of a free
space, in the case of the Forum Maximum, was entirely lost sight of, and
a Forum was regarded as a place containing courts of justice.
As, therefore, the ancient Forum was already filled with basilicae,
Caesar, wishing to build a handsome one, erected it in a separate
locality, which he purchased by the side of the Forum. This is the _Forum
Caesaris_, which was not an open space at all, but a basilica with the
temple of Venus Genitrix. It was situated at the foot of the Palatine,
by the side of the Forum Maximum, its southern part turning towards the
Vicus Tuscus, opposite the temple of Castor, as I have ascertained beyond
a doubt. I cannot give you the proofs, because I have neither maps nor
plans at hand.
The next _Forum_ planned in the same manner is that of _Augustus_, except
that a portion of it was probably an open space. It was situated at some
distance from the Roman Forum, beyond the Via Sacra and, perhaps, a
few more streets. Hirt, who is himself not rich in ideas, but in Roman
topography has often successfully revived those of earlier writers (such
as Palladio and Serlio), has demonstrated the site of this Forum. He is
not a learned man, but has a well practised eye in observing antiquities;
none of his own original views are good, but among the things he finds
in earlier authors, he can well distinguish what is correct from what
is not, a thing which learned men often cannot. The Forum of Augustus
contained the temple of Mars Ultor, where the standards of Crassus,
recovered from the Parthians, were set up, and also a magnificent
basilica; there also stood—it was a noble conception—the statues of the
most illustrious Romans, which had formerly stood in the market-place
and in the orchestra of the theatre, with the _tituli gestorum_. A
fragment of the latter is still extant fastened in a wall of the Vatican;
but it is not even possible to see whose name is mentioned in it. The
writing certainly belongs to the age of Augustus, as every one can see
who has an eye for such things. I cannot be mistaken in such a matter,
I can immediately see whether an inscription was cut before the time of
Caesar or in the age of Augustus. Such things make a residence at Rome
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account